Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 13;13(4):655.
doi: 10.3390/ani13040655.

Comprehensive Comparative Analysis Sheds Light on the Patterns of Microsatellite Distribution across Birds Based on the Chromosome-Level Genomes

Affiliations

Comprehensive Comparative Analysis Sheds Light on the Patterns of Microsatellite Distribution across Birds Based on the Chromosome-Level Genomes

Kaize Feng et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Microsatellites (SSRs) are widely distributed in the genomes of organisms and are an important genetic basis for genome evolution and phenotypic adaptation. Although the distribution patterns of microsatellites have been investigated in many phylogenetic lineages, they remain unclear within the morphologically and physiologically diverse avian clades. Here, based on high-quality chromosome-level genomes, we examined the microsatellite distribution patterns for 53 birds from 16 orders. The results demonstrated that each type of SSR had the same ratio between taxa. For example, the frequency of imperfect SSRs (I-SSRs) was 69.90-84.61%, while perfect SSRs (P-SSRs) were 14.86-28.13% and compound SSRs (C-SSRs) were 0.39-2.24%. Mononucleotide SSRs were dominant for perfect SSRs (32.66-76.48%) in most bird species (98.11%), and A(n) was the most abundant repeat motifs of P-SSRs in all birds (5.42-68.22%). Our study further confirmed that the abundance and diversity of microsatellites were less effected by evolutionary history but its length. The number of P-SSRs decreased with increasing repeat times, and longer P-SSRs motifs had a higher variability coefficient of the repeat copy number and lower diversity, indicating that longer motifs tended to have more stable preferences in avian genomes. We also found that P-SSRs were mainly distributed at the gene ends, and the functional annotation for these genes demonstrated that they were related to signal transduction and cellular process. In conclusion, our research provided avian SSR distribution patterns, which will help to explore the genetic basis for phenotypic diversity in birds.

Keywords: birds; chromosome-level genome; distribution pattern; functional annotation; microsatellite.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 8
Figure 8
The GC content of P-SSRs in different genomic regions. (a) Genome; (b) CDS region; (c) Exon region; (d) Intron region; (e) Intergenic region. The small red squares are outliers.
Figure 9
Figure 9
P-SSR distribution patterns in genes. (a) exons; (b) introns.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The result of functional annotation for genes contained P-SSRs in coding regions. (a) KEGG database (b) GO database.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of each type of SSRs (a) and P-SSRs (b).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The abundance of P-SSRs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The repeat motifs preferences of P-SSRs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phylogenetic PCA, loci/Mb heatmaps and bp/Mb heatmaps for di- (a,b), tri- (c,d), and tetranucleotide (e,f) P-SSR motifs. For all heatmaps, the yellow section represents the abundance (loci/Mb) of different motifs and the red section represents the density (bp/Mb) of each motif.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Phylogenetic PCA, loci/Mb heatmaps and bp/Mb heatmaps for penta- (a,b) and hexanucleotide (c,d) P-SSR motifs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Relationship between repeat times and number of P-SSRs.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The coefficient of variability analysis of the repeat copy number of P-SSRs among six orders. (a) All; (b) Anseriformes; (c) Apodiformes; (d) Falconiformes; (e) Galliformes; (f) Passeriformes; (g) Psittaciformes.

References

    1. Toth G., Gaspari Z., Jurka J. Microsatellites in Different Eukaryotic Genomes: Survey and Analysis. Genome Res. 2000;10:967–981. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.7.967. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li Y.-C., Korol A.B., Fahima T., Beiles A., Nevo E. Microsatellites: Genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: A review. Mol. Ecol. 2002;11:2453–2465. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01643.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma P.C., Grover A., Kahl G. Mining microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25:490–498. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.07.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Song X., Yang T., Yan X., Zheng F., Xu X., Zhou C. Comparison of microsatellite distribution patterns in twenty-nine beetle genomes. Gene. 2020;757:144919. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144919. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qi W.-H., Lu T., Zheng C.-L., Jiang X.-M., Jie H., Zhang X.-Y., Yue B.-S., Zhao G.-J. Distribution patterns of microsatellites and development of its marker in different genomic regions of forest musk deer genome based on high throughput sequencing. Aging. 2020;12:4445–4462. doi: 10.18632/aging.102895. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources