Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 9;15(4):1115.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15041115.

The Antithetic Roles of IQGAP2 and IQGAP3 in Cancers

Affiliations
Review

The Antithetic Roles of IQGAP2 and IQGAP3 in Cancers

Fei Song et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The scaffold protein family of IQ motif-containing GTPase-activating proteins (IQGAP1, 2, and 3) share a high degree of homology and comprise six functional domains. IQGAPs bind and regulate the cytoskeleton, interact with MAP kinases and calmodulin, and have GTPase-related activity, as well as a RasGAP domain. Thus, IQGAPs regulate multiple cellular processes and pathways, affecting cell division, growth, cell-cell interactions, migration, and invasion. In the past decade, significant evidence on the function of IQGAPs in signal transduction during carcinogenesis has emerged. Compared with IQGAP1, IQGAP2 and IQGAP3 were less analyzed. In this review, we summarize the different signaling pathways affected by IQGAP2 and IQGAP3, and the antithetic roles of IQGAP2 and IQGAP3 in different types of cancer. IQGAP2 expression is reduced and plays a tumor suppressor role in most solid cancer types, while IQGAP3 is overexpressed and acts as an oncogene. In lymphoma, for example, IQGAPs have partially opposite functions. There is considerable evidence that IQGAPs regulate a multitude of pathways to modulate cancer processes and chemoresistance, but some questions, such as how they trigger this signaling, through which domains, and why they play opposite roles on the same pathways, are still unanswered.

Keywords: IQGAP; biomarker; cancer; pathway; signaling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic depiction of the domain organization and amino acid homology of IQGAPs and their common binding partners (Permission obtain from OA journal: [67]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram of the IQGAP-mediated signaling pathways involved in carcinogenesis (Permission obtain from OA journal: [67]).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith J.M., Hedman A.C., Sacks D.B. IQGAPs choreograph cellular signaling from the membrane to the nucleus. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.12.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Briggs M.W., Sacks D.B. IQGAP proteins are integral components of cytoskeletal regulation. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:571–574. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor867. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pathmanathan S., Hamilton E., Atcheson E., Timson D.J. The interaction of IQGAPs with calmodulin-like proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2011;39:694–699. doi: 10.1042/BST0390694. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mosaddeghzadeh N., Nouri K., Krumbach O.H.F., Amin E., Dvorsky R., Ahmadian M.R. Selectivity Determinants of RHO GTPase Binding to IQGAPs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:12596. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212596. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. LeCour L., Jr., Boyapati V.K., Liu J., Li Z., Sacks D.B., Worthylake D.K. The Structural Basis for Cdc42-Induced Dimerization of IQGAPs. Structure. 2016;24:1499–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.06.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources