Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 15;15(4):1227.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15041227.

Single-Stage versus Multi-Stage Intramedullary Nailing for Multiple Synchronous Long Bone Impending and Pathologic Fractures in Metastatic Bone Disease and Multiple Myeloma

Affiliations

Single-Stage versus Multi-Stage Intramedullary Nailing for Multiple Synchronous Long Bone Impending and Pathologic Fractures in Metastatic Bone Disease and Multiple Myeloma

Aditya V Maheshwari et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Purpose: Determine whether perioperative outcomes differ between patients who have undergone single or multi-stage IMN procedures for impending or completed pathologic fractures.

Methods: Patients were classified into single-stage single-bone (SSSB), single-stage multiple-bone (SSMB), and multi-stage multiple-bone (MSMB) based on procedure timing and number of bones involved. Outcome variables compared included length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality and survival, initiation of rehabilitation and adjuvant therapy, and perioperative complications.

Results: There were 272 IMNs placed in 181 patients (100 males, 81 females, 55.2% and 44.8%, respectively) with a mean age of 66.3 ± 12.1 years. MSMB had significantly longer LOS (24.3 ± 14.2 days) and rehabilitation initiation (3.4 ± 2.5 days) compared to SSSB (8.5 ± 7.7 and 1.8 ± 1.6 days) and SSMB (11.5 ± 7.6 and 2.0 ± 1.6 days) subjects, respectively (both; p < 0.01). Although total perioperative complication rates in SSMB and MSMB were comparable (33.3% vs. 36.0%), they were significantly higher than SSSB (18%) (p = 0.038). MSMB had significantly more (20%) cardiopulmonary complications than SSMB (11.1%) and SSSB (4.5%) (p = 0.027). All groups exhibited comparative survivorship (8.1 ± 8.6, 7.1 ± 7.2, and 11.4 ± 11.8 months) and in-hospital mortality (4.5%, 8.9%, and 4.0%) (all; p > 0.05).

Conclusion: In comparison to MSMB, SSMB intramedullary nailing did not result in higher perioperative complication or in-hospital mortality rates in select patients with synchronous long-bone metastases but led to earlier postoperative discharge and initiation of rehabilitation.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary complications; intramedullary nailing; metastatic long bone disease; multiple stage; single stage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The study cohort and patient group overlap. Seven single-stage single-bone (SSSB) subjects had single intramedullary nails (IMNs) placed twice during separate hospitalizations and were counted as 14 unique events, whereas 13 single-stage multiple-bone (SSMB) patients had their surgery preceded or followed by a single-nail insertion during the same hospitalization and were counted in the SSMB cohort for statistical analysis despite them technically undergoing staged procedures. Four SSMB/MSMB (multiple-stage multiple-bone) patients were also considered in the SSSB group as they had a single nail placed in a different hospitalization either before or after the current hospitalization. There was one patient who had undergone a single- and multi-stage multiple-bone nailing procedures during two separate hospitalizations and was included in both SSMB and MSMB groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curve comparing postoperative survival days of SSSB, SSMB, and MSMB groups (p = 0.996).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ma K.L.S., Kohles J. Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the U.S. Cancer. 2007;109:2334–2342. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22678. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biermann J.S., Holt G.E., Lewis V.O., Schwartz H.S., Yaszemski M.J. Metastatic bone disease: Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2009;91:1518–1530. - PubMed
    1. Arneson T.J., Li S., Peng Y., Weinhandl E.D., Blaes A., Cetin K., Chia V.M., Stryker S., Pinzone J.J., Acquavella J. Estimated number of prevalent cases of metastatic bone disease in the US adult population. Clin. Epidemiol. 2012;4:87–93. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S28339. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harvey N., Ahlmann E.R., Allison D.C., Wang L., Menendez L.R. Endoprostheses Last Longer Than Intramedullary Devices in Proximal Femur Metastases. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012;470:684–691. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2038-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piccioli A., Rossi B., Scaramuzzo L., Spinelli M.S., Yang Z., Maccauro G. Intramedullary nailing for treatment of pathologic femoral fractures due to metastases. Injury. 2014;45:412–417. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.025. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources