Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 20;15(4):1334.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15041334.

Occupational Cancers among Employed Women: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Occupational Cancers among Employed Women: A Narrative Review

Federica Teglia et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The facts that occupational cancer in women is under-investigated, with few in-depth analyses are well known. In recent decades the workforce has changed, with an increasing number of women employed. Therefore, the inclusion of women in occupational cancer studies has become more urgent and feasible than in the past decades. The difficulties to evaluate occupational causes of female gynecologic tumors in most past cohorts and the potential variation in outcome responses between men and women must be taken into consideration. This narrative review discusses women's occupational cancer as a current area of research, focusing on three groups of workers characterized by peculiar exposure to occupational carcinogens and where women are often employed: beauticians and hairdressers; farmers; and healthcare workers. We discuss the most relevant cancers in each working category, with a particular focus on female breast cancer. In the three industries reviewed in detail, there are some risk factors which may affect primarily women, inducing breast cancer and cervical cancer, as well as risk factors that are carcinogenic in both genders, but whose effects are less well known in women.

Keywords: epidemiology; female; neoplasms; occupational diseases; occupational exposure; sex factors; women; women’s health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hohenadel K., Raj P.D., Demers P.A., Zahm S.H., Blair A. The Inclusion of Women in Studies of Occupational Cancer: A Review of the Epidemiologic Literature from 1991–2009. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2015;58:276–281. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22424. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Purdue M.P., Hutchings S.J., Rushton L., Silverman D.T. The proportion of cancer attributable to occupational exposures. Ann. Epidemiol. 2015;25:188–192. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.11.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doll R., Peto R. The causes of cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1981;66:1191–1308. doi: 10.1093/jnci/66.6.1192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blair A., Zahm S.H., Silverman D.T. Occupational cancer among women: Research status and methodologic considerations. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1999;36:6–17. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199907)36:1<6::AID-AJIM2>3.0.CO;2-F. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silvaggio T., Mattison D.R. Setting occupational health standards: Toxicokinetic differences among and between men and women. J. Occup. Med. 1994;36:849–854. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources