Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 18;10(2):179.
doi: 10.3390/children10020179.

Telephone Referral to a Paediatric Emergency Department: Why Do Parents Not Show Up?

Mélanie Freiermuth  1 , Christopher J Newman  1   2 , Judit Villoslada  3
Affiliations

Telephone Referral to a Paediatric Emergency Department: Why Do Parents Not Show Up?

Mélanie Freiermuth et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Medical call centres can evaluate and refer patients to an emergency department (ED), a physician or provide guidance for self-care. Our aim was (1) to determine parental adherence to an ED orientation after being referred by the nurses of a call centre, (2) to observe how adherence varies according to children's characteristics and (3) to assess parents' reasons for non-adherence. This was a prospective cohort study set in the Lausanne agglomeration, Switzerland. From 1 February to 5 March 2022, paediatric calls (<16 years old) with an ED orientation were selected. Life-threatening emergencies were excluded. Parental adherence was then verified in the ED. All parents were contacted by telephone to respond to a questionnaire regarding their call. Parental adherence to the ED orientation was 75%. Adherence decreased significantly with increasing distance between the place the call originated and the ED. The child's age, sex and health complaints within calls had no effect on adherence. The three major reasons for non-adherence to telephone referral were: improvement in the child's condition (50.7%), parents' decision to go elsewhere (18.3%) and an appointment with a paediatrician (15.5%). Our results offer new perspectives to optimise the telephone assessment of paediatric patients and decrease barriers to adherence.

Keywords: children; emergency department; non-adherence; telephone triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of selection and exclusion of calls.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Parental adherence according to distance from their location to the paediatric emergency department.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Parental reasons for non-adherence, expressed in percentage (%, n = 71).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bolli S., Melle G.V., Laubscher B. After-hours paediatric telephone triage and advice: The Neuchatel experience. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2005;164:568–572. doi: 10.1007/s00431-005-1687-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanson R.M., Exley B.J., Ngo P., Fitzpatrick M.P., Petering E.L., Matthews S.J., Lechner D., Daniels C.J. Paediatric telephone triage and advice: The demand continues. Med. J. Aust. 2004;180:333–335. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05968.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kempe A., Dempsey C., Hegarty T., Frei N., Chandramouli V., Poole S.R. Reducing after-hours referrals by an after-hours call center with second-level physician triage. Pediatrics. 2000;106:226–230. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.S1.226. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doctor K., Correa K., Olympia R.P. Evaluation of an after-hours call center: Are pediatric patients appropriately referred to the emergency department? Pediatr. Emerg. Care. 2014;30:798–804. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Purc-Stephenson R.J., Thrasher C. Patient compliance with telephone triage recommendations: A meta-analytic review. Patient Educ. Couns. 2012;87:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.019. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources