Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 15;12(4):822.
doi: 10.3390/foods12040822.

Rapid Quantitative Method Development for Beef and Pork Lymph Nodes Using BAX® System Real Time Salmonella Assay

Affiliations

Rapid Quantitative Method Development for Beef and Pork Lymph Nodes Using BAX® System Real Time Salmonella Assay

David A Vargas et al. Foods. .

Abstract

The goal of this study was to develop a rapid RT-PCR enumeration method for Salmonella in pork and beef lymph nodes (LNs) utilizing BAX®-System-SalQuant® as well as to assess the performance of the methodology in comparison with existing ones. For study one: PCR curve development, pork, and beef LNs (n = 64) were trimmed, sterilized, pulverized, spiked with 0.00 to 5.00 Log CFU/LN using Salmonella Typhimurium, and then homogenized with BAX-MP media. Samples were incubated at 42 °C and tested at several time points using the BAX®-System-RT-PCR Assay for Salmonella. Cycle-Threshold values from the BAX®-System, for each Salmonella concentration were recorded and utilized for statistical analysis. For study two: Method comparison; additional pork and beef LNs (n = 52) were spiked and enumerated by (1) 3M™EB-Petrifilm™ + XLD-replica plate, (2) BAX®-System-SalQuant®, and (3) MPN. Linear-fit equations for LNs were estimated with recovery times of 6 h and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 10 CFU/LN. Slopes and intercepts for LNs using BAX®-System-SalQuant® when compared with MPN were not significantly different (p < 0.05), while the same parameters for 3M™EB-Petrifilm™ + XLD-replica plate were significantly different (p > 0.05). The results support the capability of BAX®-System-SalQuant® to enumerate Salmonella in pork and beef LNs. This development adds support to the use of PCR-based quantification methodologies for pathogen loads in meat products.

Keywords: Salmonella quantification; beef lymph nodes; pathogen control; pork lymph nodes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The company had no role in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data conclusions nor in the writing of this article. The company contributed with supplies to develop the methodology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Linear regression for curve development of small and medium pork lymph nodes at 6 h and 8 h of recovery time, comparing cycle threshold (CT) values and inoculation levels (Log CFU/LN), (n = 15 per inoculation level). A small level of jittering was added to the actual dots for visualization purposes. RMSE = root mean squared error.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear regression for curve development of small and medium beef lymph nodes at 6 h and 8 h of recovery time, comparing cycle threshold (CT) values and inoculation levels (Log CFU/LN), (n = 15 per inoculation level). A small level of jittering was added to the actual dots for visualization purposes. RMSE = root mean squared error.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graphical representation of the linear correlation comparing 3M™ EB Petrifilm™ + XLD replica plate and BAX®-System-SalQuant® versus most probably number (MPN) for quantification of Salmonella in pork lymph nodes (n = 25 per method). The dots represent the actual data points.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graphical representation of the linear correlation comparing EB Petrifilm + XLD replica plate and BAX®-System-SalQuant® versus MPN for quantification of Salmonella in beef lymph nodes (n = 25 per method). The dots represent the actual data points.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Surveillance for Foodborne Disease Outbreaks—United States, 2017: Annual Report; Atlanta, 2019. [(accessed on 10 October 2022)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/fdoss/annual-reports/index.html.
    1. Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration Foodborne Illness Source Attribution Estimates for 2018 for Salmonella, Escherichia Coli O157, Listeria Monocytogenes, and Campylobacter Using Multi-Year Outbreak Surveillance Data, United States. [(accessed on 10 October 2022)];2020 Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/ifsac/annual-reports.html.
    1. Food Safety and Inspection Service Changes to the Salmonella Verification Testing Program: Proposed Performance Standards for Salmonella in Raw Comminuted Pork and Intact or Non-Intact Pork Cuts and Related Agency Verification Procedures. [(accessed on 8 October 2022)];2022 Available online: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/policy/federal-register-rulemaking/federal-reg....
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Salmonella and Food. [(accessed on 5 October 2022)];2022 Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/communication/salmonella-food.html.
    1. Harvey R.B., Norman K.N., Anderson R.C., Nisbet D.J. A preliminary study on the presence of salmonella in lymph nodes of sows at processing plants in the United States. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1602. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101602. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources