Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 36833077
- PMCID: PMC9956585
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040543
Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: The efficacy and safety of a cervical ripening balloon (CRB) in women with a previous cesarean section (CS) and unfavorable Bishop score are still controversial. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed across six tertiary hospitals from 2015 to 2019. Women with one previous transverse CS, singleton cephalic term pregnancy and BS < 6 were included if submitted to labor induction with a CRB. The main outcome was the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) after CRB ripening. Secondary outcomes were abnormal composite fetal and maternal outcomes. Results: Of the 265 women included, 57.3% had successful vaginal birth. Augmentation improved vaginal delivery (32.2% vs. 21.2%). Intrapartum analgesia was associated with an increased VBAC rate (58.6% vs. 34.5%). Maternal BMI ≥30 and age ≥40 years increased emergency CS rate (11.8% vs. 28.3% and 7.2 vs. 15.9%). Composite adverse maternal outcome occurred in 4.8% of CRB group women and increased to 17.6% when associated with oxytocin. Uterine rupture occurred in one case (0.4%) in the CRB-oxytocin group. Poorer fetal outcome occurred after emergency CS, if compared to successful VBAC (12.4% vs. 3.3%). Conclusions: In women with a previous CS and unfavorable Bishop score, induction of labor with a CRB can be considered safe and effective.
Keywords: cervical ripening balloon; cesarean section; trial of labor after cesarean section; unfavorable cervix.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose, no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article, no affiliations with, or involvement in, any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript, and no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Figures
References
-
- Thomas J., Paranjothy S. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press. 2001. [(accessed on 11 February 2023)]. Available online: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/93112/1/nscs_audit.pdf.
-
- Landon M.B., Hauth J.C., Leveno K.J., Spong C.Y., Leindecker S., Varner M.W., Moawad A.H., Caritis S.N., Harper M., Wapner R.J., et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:2581–2589. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Curtin S.C., Gregory K.D., Korst L.M., Uddin S.F. Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: New data from the birth certificate, 2013. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 2015;64:1–13. - PubMed
-
- Grobman W.A., Lai Y., Landon M.B., Spong C.Y., Leveno K.J., Rouse D.J., Varner M.W., Moawad A.H., Caritis S.N., Harper M., et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;109:806–812. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
