Dancing for Parkinson's Disease Online: Clinical Trial Process Evaluation
- PMID: 36833138
- PMCID: PMC9957486
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040604
Dancing for Parkinson's Disease Online: Clinical Trial Process Evaluation
Abstract
Background: Dancing is an engaging physical activity for people living with Parkinson's disease (PD). We conducted a process evaluation for a PD trial on online dancing. Methods: "ParkinDANCE Online" was co-produced by people with PD, healthcare professionals, dance instructors, and a PD organisation. The evaluation mapped the following inputs: (i) stakeholder steering group to oversee program design, processes, and outcomes; (ii) co-design of online classes, based on a research evidence synthesis, expert advice, and stakeholder recommendations; (iii) trial fidelity. The key activities were (i) the co-design of classes and instruction manuals, (ii) the education of dance teachers, (iii) fidelity checking, (iv) online surveys, (v) and post-trial focus groups and interviews with participants. The outputs pertained to: (i) recruitment, (ii) retention, (iii) adverse events, (iv) fidelity, (v) protocol variations, and (vi) participant feedback. Results: Twelve people with PD, four dance instructors and two physiotherapists, participated in a 6-week online dance program. There was no attrition, nor were there any adverse events. Program fidelity was strong with few protocol variations. Classes were delivered as planned, with 100% attendance. Dancers valued skills mastery. Dance teachers found digital delivery to be engaging and practical. The safety of online testing was facilitated by careful screening and a home safety checklist. Conclusions: It is feasible to deliver online dancing to people with early PD.
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; dance; digital healthcare; exercise; physical activity; physiotherapy; rehabilitation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Fight Parkinson’s participated in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Harvey G., Gifford W., Cummings G., Kelly J., Kislov R., Kitson A., Pettersson L., Wallin L., Wilson P., Ehrenberg A. Mobilising evidence to improve nursing practice: A qualitative study of leadership roles and processes in four countries. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2019;90:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.017. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sarkies M.N., Bowles K.A., Skinner E.H., Haas R., Lane H., Haines T.P. The effectiveness of research implementation strategies for promoting evidence-informed policy and management decisions in healthcare: A systematic review. Implement. Sci. 2017;12:132. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0662-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bloem B.R., Henderson E.J., Dorsey E.R., Okun M.S., Okubadejo N., Chan P., Andrejack J., Darweesh S.K.L., Munneke M. Integrated and patient-centred management of Parkinson’s disease: A network model for reshaping chronic neurological care. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:623–634. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30064-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous