Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 7;20(4):2898.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042898.

The Role of Conspiracy Theories, Perceived Risk, and Trust in Science on COVID-19 Vaccination Decisiveness: Evidence from Cyprus

Affiliations

The Role of Conspiracy Theories, Perceived Risk, and Trust in Science on COVID-19 Vaccination Decisiveness: Evidence from Cyprus

Marilena Mousoulidou et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

COVID-19 reminded us of the importance of vaccinating for successfully overcoming health-related crises. Yet, vaccine hesitancy is still present. This study examined the impacts of conspiracy theories, perceived risk, and trust in science on COVID-19 vaccination decisiveness. The study was conducted at the end of the third wave of the pandemic, in July 2021, in Cyprus. Data were collected via an online self-administered anonymous survey using convenience and snowball sampling methods. Participants were 363 adults who completed a set of questionnaires that examined their believability in ten vaccine-related conspiracy theories, their perceived dangerousness of COVID-19, and their level of trust in science and scientists. The results suggest that (a) participants with a high conspiracy theory belief are less likely to be vaccinated, (b) participants who perceive COVID-19 as a dangerous disease are more likely to be vaccinated, and (c) participants with high trust in science are more likely to be vaccinated. The implications of the findings are discussed and can be used by public health officials in their campaigns.

Keywords: COVID-19; conspiracy theories; pandemic; perceived risk; social media; trust in science; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19. 2020. [(accessed on 1 October 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-genera....
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Weekly Epidemiological Update on COVID-19—21 September 2022. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2022. [(accessed on 15 October 2022)]. Emergency Situational Updates; Emergency Reports Edition 110. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on....
    1. Cubitt L.J., Im Y.R., Scott C.J., Jeynes L.C., Molyneux P.D. Beyond PPE: A Mixed Qualitative–Quantitative Study Capturing the Wider Issues Affecting Doctors’ Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e050223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050223. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Revythis A., Shah S., Enyioma S., Ghose A., Patel M., Karathanasi A., Sanchez E., Boussios S. The Experience of a Single NHS England Trust on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Junior and Middle-Grade Doctors: What Is Next? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:10413. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910413. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salem J., Hawkins L., Sundaram A., Gates J., Suleman S., Mistry M., Ong Y.-E., Fernando A., Snelgrove H., Chakravorty I. COVID-19 and the Impact on Doctor Wellbeing and Training: A Mixed Methods Study. Physician. 2021;6:1–8. doi: 10.38192/1.6.3.2. - DOI

Substances