A Systematic Literature Review of the Factors Influencing Hearing Protection Device Usage among Industrial Workers
- PMID: 36833630
- PMCID: PMC9965930
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20042934
A Systematic Literature Review of the Factors Influencing Hearing Protection Device Usage among Industrial Workers
Abstract
This systematic literature review (SLR) aims to determine the factors influencing the use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) among industrial workers. This study was guided by the PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) review method, and four databases comprising Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Google Scholar were employed. A total of 196 articles were identified, and 28 studies on the factors associated with HPD use among industrial workers from 2006 to 2021 met the inclusion criteria. Resultantly, five main themes emerged from this review: sociodemographic (29%), interpersonal influences (18%), situational influences (18%), cognitive-perceptual (29%), and health-promoting behavior (6%) associated with HPD use among industrial workers. A total of 17 sub-themes were identified, including age, gender, educational level, noise level, working experience, social models, interpersonal support, social norms, safety climate, training, organizational support, perceived barrier, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefit, self-efficacy, and cues to action. The significant factors influencing workers to use HPDs are sociodemographic, interpersonal influences, situational influences, and health-promoting behavior. Future studies should focus on the cues to action toward human behavior influencing the use of HPDs, workers' health status, and comorbidities of hearing loss. Therefore, this systematic study gives valuable reference resources for up-and-coming researchers as well as new knowledge to expert professionals and academics in various industries.
Keywords: factors; hearing protection device; industrial workers; preferred reporting items for systematic; systematic literature review.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28685503 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 07;7:CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4. PMID: 23076923 Updated.
-
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 13;(11):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub6. PMID: 22513929 Updated.
-
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;(9):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub5. PMID: 21901696 Updated.
-
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 07;(9):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub4. PMID: 19821342 Updated.
Cited by
-
Effect of Occupational Noise on Employee Health: A Longitudinal Study.Noise Health. 2024 Oct-Dec 01;26(123):514-522. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_66_24. Epub 2024 Dec 30. Noise Health. 2024. PMID: 39787553 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory Changes in Occupational Health Associated With Metabolic Diseases in Adult Workers.Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Apr 3:15598276241243277. doi: 10.1177/15598276241243277. Online ahead of print. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024. PMID: 39554922 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of workplace health promotion programs for industrial workers: a systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21365-8. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39815242 Free PMC article.
-
The influencing factors of hearing protection device usage among noise-exposed workers in Guangdong Province: a structural equation modeling-based survey.BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18428-7. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38622576 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of the prevalence of musicians' hearing loss.Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 13;13:1472134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1472134. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40017553 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bockstael A., De Bruyne L., Vinck B., Botteldooren D. Hearing protection in industry: Companies’ policy and workers’ perception. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2013;43:512–517. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.08.009. - DOI
-
- Department of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia . Occupational Safety and Health (Noise Exposure) Regulations 2019. Department of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia; Putrajaya, Malaysia: 2019.
-
- Suter A.H. Standards and Regulations. In: Berger E., Royster L., Royster J., Driscoll D., Layne M., editors. The Noise Manual. 5th ed. American Industrial Hygiene Association; Fairfax, VA, USA: 2003. pp. 639–668.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous