Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3401.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043401.

Organizational Risk Factors for Aircrew Health: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

Affiliations

Organizational Risk Factors for Aircrew Health: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

Elaine Cristina Marqueze et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Addressing the field of health and safety at work, the primary objective of the present systematic review was to analyze the organizational risk factors for aircrew health according to professional category (flight attendants and pilots/co-pilots) and their consequences. The secondary objective was to identify the countries in which studies were carried out, focusing on the quality of content of the publications. The Medline/Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for eligible studies according to PRISMA statements. The risk of bias and the methodological quality of the studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Loney tools. Of the 3230 abstracts of articles screened, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the research conducted on risk factors for the work organization of aircrew was carried out in the United States and the European Union and had moderate or low-quality methodology and evidence. However, the findings are homogeneous and allow the most prevalent organizational risk factors for the health of aircrew to be determined, namely, high work demand, long hours, and night work. Consequently, the most pervasive health problems were sleep disturbances, mental health disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, and fatigue. Thus, the regulation of the aircrew profession must prioritize measures that minimize these risk factors to promote better health and sleep for these professionals and, consequently, to provide excellent safety for workers and passengers.

Keywords: co-pilots; flight attendants; occupational exposure; pilots; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search and selection process according to PRISMA statement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Countries of publication of studies reviewed.

References

    1. Transporte Aéreo—Sumário Executivo 2019. Brasília, 2020. Disponível em: Dados do Anuário do Transporte Aéreo—Português (Brasil) [(accessed on 10 March 2021)]; Available online: https://www.gov.br/anac/pt-br/assuntos/dados-e-estatisticas/mercado-de-t....
    1. Caldwell J.A. Fatigue in aviation. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2005;3:85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2004.07.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sack R.L. Jet Lag. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:440–447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0909838. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goode J.H. Are pilots at risk of accidents due to fatigue? J. Saf. Res. 2003;34:309–313. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(03)00033-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Powell D.M.C., Spencer M.B., Holland D., Broadbent E., Petrie K.J. Pilot fatigue in short-haul operations: Effects of number of sectors, duty length, and time of day. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2007;78:698–701. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources