Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 11;24(4):3638.
doi: 10.3390/ijms24043638.

Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis Reveals Salt-Tolerance Pathways in the Leaves and Roots of ZM-4 (Malus zumi) in the Early Stages of Salt Stress

Affiliations

Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis Reveals Salt-Tolerance Pathways in the Leaves and Roots of ZM-4 (Malus zumi) in the Early Stages of Salt Stress

Dajiang Wang et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The breeding of salt-tolerant rootstock relies heavily on the availability of salt-tolerant Malus germplasm resources. The first step in developing salt-tolerant resources is to learn their molecular and metabolic underpinnings. Hydroponic seedlings of both ZM-4 (salt-tolerant resource) and M9T337 (salt-sensitive rootstock) were treated with a solution of 75 mM salinity. ZM-4's fresh weight increased, then decreased, and then increased again after being treated with NaCl, whereas M9T337's fresh weight continued to decrease. The results of transcriptome and metabolome after 0 h (CK) and 24 h of NaCl treatment showed that the leaves of ZM-4 had a higher content of flavonoids (phloretinm, naringenin-7-O-glucoside, kaempferol-3-O-galactoside, epiafzelechin, etc.) and the genes (CHI, CYP, FLS, LAR, and ANR) related to the flavonoid synthesis pathway showed up-regulation, suggesting a high antioxidant capacity. In addition to the high polyphenol content (L-phenylalanine, 5-O-p-coumaroyl quinic acid) and the high related gene expression (4CLL9 and SAT), the roots of ZM-4 exhibited a high osmotic adjustment ability. Under normal growing conditions, the roots of ZM-4 contained a higher content of some amino acids (L-proline, tran-4-hydroxy-L-prolin, L-glutamine, etc.) and sugars (D-fructose 6-phosphate, D-glucose 6-phosphate, etc.), and the genes (GLT1, BAM7, INV1, etc.) related to these two pathways were highly expressed. Furthermore, some amino acids (S-(methyl) glutathione, N-methyl-trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline, etc.) and sugars (D-sucrose, maltotriose, etc.) increased and genes (ALD1, BCAT1, AMY1.1, etc.) related to the pathways showed up-regulation under salt stress. This research provided theoretical support for the application of breeding salt-tolerant rootstocks by elucidating the molecular and metabolic mechanisms of salt tolerance during the early stages of salt treatment for ZM-4.

Keywords: Malus; integrated analysis; molecular mechanism; salt tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fresh weight of ZM-4 and M9T337 and differential-expression genes (DEGs) in different combinations under salt stress. (a) Fresh weight of ZM-4 and M9T337 after NaCl treatment. (b) The number of DEGs in different combinations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in three combinations. (a) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-CKL vs. M-TL. (b) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in Z-CKL vs. Z-TL. (c) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-TL vs. Z-TL. (d) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-CKR vs. M-TR. (e) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in Z-CKR vs. Z-TR. (f) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-TR vs. Z-TR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in three combinations. (a) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-CKL vs. M-TL. (b) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in Z-CKL vs. Z-TL. (c) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-TL vs. Z-TL. (d) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-CKR vs. M-TR. (e) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in Z-CKR vs. Z-TR. (f) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-TR vs. Z-TR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in three combinations. (a) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-CKL vs. M-TL. (b) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in Z-CKL vs. Z-TL. (c) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-TL vs. Z-TL. (d) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-CKR vs. M-TR. (e) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in Z-CKR vs. Z-TR. (f) The top 20 GO terms for DEGs in M-TR vs. Z-TR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The top 20 KEGG pathways for DEGs in three combinations. (a) The top 20 KEGG pathways for DEGs in M-CKL vs. M-TL. (b) The top 20 KEGG pathways for DEGs in Z-CKL vs. Z-TL. (c) The top 20 KEGG pathways for DEGs in M-TL vs. Z-TL. (d) The top 20 KEGG pathways for DEGs in M-CKR vs. M-TR. (e) The top 20 KEGG pathways for DEGs in Z-CKR vs. Z-TR. (f) The top 20 KEGG pathways for DEGs in M-TR vs. Z-TR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Venn diagrams of DEGs in leaves and roots among different combinations. (a) The Venn diagram of DEGs in leaves among different combinations. (b) The Venn diagram of DEGs in roots among different combinations.
Figure 5
Figure 5
PCA of metabolites in leaves and roots in ZM-4 and M9T337 under salt stress. (a) PCA of metabolites in leaves in ZM-4 and M9T337 under salt stress. (b) PCA of metabolites in roots in ZM-4 and M9T337 under salt stress.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The number of DAMs in leaves and roots of different combinations. (a) The number of DAMs in leaves of different combinations. (b) The number of DAMs in roots of different combinations.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The top 15 DAMs based on the values of VIP in different combinations. (a) The top 15 DAMs based on the values of VIP in leaves of M-CKL vs. M-TL. (b) The top 15 DAMs based on the values of VIP in leaves of Z-CKL vs. Z-TL. (c) The top 15 DAMs based on the values of VIP in leaves of M-TL vs. Z-TL. (d) The top 15 DAMs based on the values of VIP in roots of M-CKR vs. M-TR. (e) The top 15 DAMs based on the values of VIP in roots of Z-CKR vs. Z-TR. (f) The top 15 DAMs based on the values of VIP in roots of M-TR vs. Z-TR.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Venn diagrams of DAMs in leaves and roots among different combinations. (a) The Venn diagram of DAMs in leaves among different combinations. (b) The Venn diagram of DAMs in roots among different combinations.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites in different combinations. (a) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in M-CKL vs. M-TL. (b) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in Z-CKL vs. Z-TL. (c) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in M-TL vs. Z-TL. (d) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in M-CKR vs. M-TR. (e) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in Z-CKR vs. Z-TR. (f) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in M-TR vs. Z-TR.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites in different combinations. (a) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in M-CKL vs. M-TL. (b) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in Z-CKL vs. Z-TL. (c) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in M-TL vs. Z-TL. (d) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in M-CKR vs. M-TR. (e) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in Z-CKR vs. Z-TR. (f) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in M-TR vs. Z-TR.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites in different combinations. (a) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in M-CKL vs. M-TL. (b) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in Z-CKL vs. Z-TL. (c) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of leaves in M-TL vs. Z-TL. (d) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in M-CKR vs. M-TR. (e) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in Z-CKR vs. Z-TR. (f) The top 25 joint-loading elements of genes and metabolites of roots in M-TR vs. Z-TR.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The main salt-tolerance genes and metabolites in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway (PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; C4′H, cinnamate-4′-hydroxylase; CYP, cytochrome P450; PGT, phydroxybenzoate geranyltransferases; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; F3′H, flavonoid-3′-hydroxylase; F3H, flavonoid-3-hydroxylase; LDOX, leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase; FLS, flavonol synthase; F3′5′H, flavonoid-3′,5′-hydroxylase; LAR, leucoanthocyantin reductase; ANR, anthocyanidin synthase).
Figure 11
Figure 11
The possible paths of salt stress tolerance in the roots of ZM-4. (Ellipsis indicates the presence of other substances or genes that are not listed).

References

    1. Jamil A., Riza S., Ashraf M., Foolad M.R. Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011;30:435–458. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2011.605739. - DOI
    1. Du Z.J., Zhai H., Luo X.S., Cheng S.H., Pan Z.Y. Field identification of salt tolerance of apple rootstocks. China Fruits. 2001;2:1–4.
    1. Zhu J.K. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167:313–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dai W.S., Wang M., Gong X.Q., Liu J.H. The transcription factor FcWRKY40 of Fortunella crassifolia functions positively in salt tolerance through modulation of ion homeostasis and proline biosynthesis by directly regulating SOS2 and P5CS1 homologs. New Phytol. 2018;219:972–989. doi: 10.1111/nph.15240. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sodani R., Mundiyara R. Salinity stress: Its impact on plant growth and development. Agric. Food E-Newsl. 2021;6:535–537.