Performance of Tuberculosis Molecular Bacterial Load Assay Compared to Alere TB-LAM in Urine of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients with HIV Co-Infections
- PMID: 36835127
- PMCID: PMC9965206
- DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043715
Performance of Tuberculosis Molecular Bacterial Load Assay Compared to Alere TB-LAM in Urine of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients with HIV Co-Infections
Abstract
Alternative tools are needed to improve the detection of M. tuberculosis (M. tb) in HIV co-infections. We evaluated the utility of Tuberculosis Molecular Bacterial Load Assay (TB-MBLA) compared to lipoarabinomannan (LAM) to detect M. tb in urine. Sputum Xpert MTB/RIF-positive patients were consented to provide urine at baseline, weeks 2, 8, 16, and 24 of treatment for TB-MBLA, culture, and LAM. Results were compared with sputum cultures and microscopy. Initial M. tb. H37Rv spiking experiments were performed to validate the tests. A total of 63 urine samples from 47 patients were analyzed. The median age (IQR) was 38 (30-41) years; 25 (53.2%) were male, 3 (6.5%) had urine for all visits, 45 (95.7%) were HIV positive, of whom 18 (40%) had CD4 cell counts below 200 cells/µL, and 33 (73.3%) were on ART at enrollment. Overall urine LAM positivity was 14.3% compared to 4.8% with TB-MBLA. Culture and microscopy of their sputum counterparts were positive in 20.6% and 12.7% of patients, respectively. Of the three patients with urine and sputum at baseline, one (33.33%) had urine TB-MBLA and LAM positive compared to 100% with sputum MGIT culture positive. Spearman's rank correction coefficient (r) between TB-MBLA and MGIT was -0.85 and 0.89 with a solid culture, p > 0.05. TB-MBLA has the promising potential to improve M. tb detection in urine of HIV-co-infected patients and complement current TB diagnostics.
Keywords: HIV; TB-LAM; TB-MBLA; TB-lipoarabinomannan; human immunodeficiency virus; tuberculosis-molecular bacterial load assay; urine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures



References
-
- World Health Organization . Global Tuberculosis Report 2021: Supplementary Material. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2022.
-
- Parsons L.M., Somoskövi A., Gutierrez C., Lee E., Paramasivan C.N., Abimiku A., Spector S., Roscigno G., Nkengasong J. Laboratory Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Resource-Poor Countries: Challenges and Opportunities. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011;24:314–350. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00059-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Friedrich S.O., Rachow A., Saathoff E., Singh K., Mangu C.D., Dawson R., Phillips P.P., Venter A., Bateson A., Boehme C.C., et al. Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay as an early sputum biomarker of response to tuberculosis treatment. Lancet Respir. Med. 2013;1:462–470. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70119-X. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials