Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 12;12(4):1460.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12041460.

Effects of Individualised High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Crystalloid Administration on Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Single-Blinded Pilot Study

Affiliations

Effects of Individualised High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Crystalloid Administration on Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Single-Blinded Pilot Study

Sebastian Blecha et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is typically conducted in steep Trendelenburg position (STP). The aim of the study was to evaluate whether crystalloid administration and individual management of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) improve peri- and post-operative pulmonary function in patients undergoing RALP.

Design: Prospective randomised single-centre single-blinded explorative study.

Setting: Patients were either allocated to a standard PEEP (5 cmH2O) group or an individualised high PEEP group. Furthermore, each group was divided into a liberal and a restrictive crystalloid group (8 vs. 4 mL/kg/h predicted body weight). Individualised PEEP levels were determined by means of preoperative recruitment manoeuvre and PEEP titration in STP.

Participants: Informed consent was obtained from 98 patients scheduled for elective RALP.

Interventions: The following intraoperative parameters were analysed in each of the four study groups: ventilation setting (peak inspiratory pressure [PIP], plateau pressure, driving pressure [Pdriv], lung compliance [LC] and mechanical power [MP]) and postoperative pulmonary function (bed-side spirometry). The spirometric parameters Tiffeneau index (FEV1/FVC ratio) and mean forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75) were measured pre- and post-operatively. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and groups were compared with ANOVA. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The two individualised high PEEP groups (mean PEEP 15.5 [±1.71 cmH2O]) showed intraoperative significantly higher PIP, plateau pressure and MP levels but significantly decreased Pdriv and increased LC. On the first and second postoperative day, patients with individualised high PEEP levels had a significantly higher mean Tiffeneau index and FEF25-75. Perioperative oxygenation and ventilation and postoperative spirometric parameters were not influenced by restrictive or liberal crystalloid infusion in either of the two respective PEEP groups.

Conclusions: Individualised high PEEP levels (≥14 cmH2O) during RALP improved intraoperative blood oxygenation and resulted in more lung-protective ventilation. Furthermore, postoperative pulmonary function was improved for up to 48 h after surgery in the sum of the two individualised high PEEP groups. Restrictive crystalloid infusion during RALP seemed to have no effect on peri- and post-operative oxygenation and pulmonary function.

Keywords: fluid management; individual PEEP; pulmonary function; robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy; steep Trendelenburg position.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests in relation to this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the protocol and interventions for the study groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences in mechanical ventilation parameters between the study groups during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (n = 98) Notes: * p < 0.05; # absolute changes (%) in the added-up standard or individualised PEEP groups compared to T1; entries depict the mean (SD), and p-values compare the four treatment arms at each timepoint using an ANOVA; FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2: partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood; T1: 5 min after intubation in supine position, T2: 30 min after the start of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, T3: 60 min after the start of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, T4: 90 min after the start of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, T5: before extubation in supine position; mechanical power: calculated with the following formula: mechanical power = 0.098 × tidal volume × respiratory rate × (PIP − 0.5 × driving pressure).

References

    1. Tewari A., Sooriakumaran P., Bloch D.A., Seshadri-Kreaden U., Hebert A.E., Wiklund P. Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012;62:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Novara G., Ficarra V., Rosen R.C., Artibani W., Costello A., Eastham J.A., Graefen M., Guazzoni G., Shariat S.F., Stolzenburg J., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012;62:431–452. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W., Cestari A., Galfano A., Graefen M., Guazzoni G., Guillonneau B., Menon M., Montorsi F., et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 2009;55:1037–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danic M.J., Chow M., Alexander G., Bhandari A., Menon M., Brown M. Anesthesia considerations for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A review of 1500 cases. J. Robot. Surg. 2007;1:119–123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0024-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gainsburg D.M. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:596–604. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources