Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 14;13(2):325.
doi: 10.3390/jpm13020325.

Myopia Control with Low-Dose Atropine in European Children: Six-Month Results from a Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study

Affiliations

Myopia Control with Low-Dose Atropine in European Children: Six-Month Results from a Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study

Anders Hvid-Hansen et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

The effect and safety of low-dose atropine in myopia control have not been studied in randomized, placebo-controlled trials outside Asia. We investigated the efficacy and safety of 0.1% atropine loading dose and 0.01% atropine compared with a placebo in a European population. Investigator-initiated, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, equal-allocation, multicenter study comparing 0.1% atropine loading dose (six months) followed by 0.01% atropine (18 months), 0.01% atropine (24 months), and placebo (24 months). Participants were monitored for a 12-months washout period. Outcome measures were axial length (AL), cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE), photopic and mesopic pupil size, accommodation amplitude, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse reactions and events. We randomized 97 participants (mean [standard deviation] age, 9.4 [1.7] years; 55 girls (57%) and 42 boys (43%)). After six months, AL was 0.13 mm shorter (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.18 to -0.07 [adjusted p < 0.001]) with 0.1% atropine loading dose and 0.06 mm shorter (95% CI, -0.11 to -0.01 [adjusted p = 0.06]) with 0.01% atropine than in the placebo group. We observed similar dose-dependent changes in SE, pupil size, accommodation amplitude, and adverse reactions. No significant differences in visual acuity or IOP were found between groups, and no serious adverse reactions were reported. We found a dose-dependent effect of low-dose atropine in European children without adverse reactions requiring photochromatic or progressive spectacles. Our results are comparable to those observed in East Asia, indicating that results on myopia control with low-dose atropine are generalizable across populations with different racial backgrounds.

Keywords: axial length; low-dose atropine; myopia; myopia control; spherical equivalent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram for the flow of participants. Notes: The run-in phase consisted of at-home administration of lubricant eye drops to access and maximize future treatment adherence. Abbreviations: CONSORT = consolidated standards of reporting trials; N = number of participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in AL from baseline. Notes: Mean change in axial length from baseline to six-month visit with placebo (blue), 0.01% atropine (red), and 0.1% atropine loading dose (green). Error bars denote the 95% CIs of the mean changes. Means and CIs are derived from the constrained linear mixed model with inherent baseline adjustment. P and adj-P values are presented in Table 2. Abbreviations: adj-P = adjusted P; CI = confidence interval.

References

    1. Holden B.A., Fricke T.R., Wilson D.A., Jong M., Naidoo K.S., Sankaridurg P., Wong T.Y., Naduvilath T., Resnikoff S. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee J.H., Jee D., Kwon J.-W., Lee W.K. Prevalence and risk factors for myopia in a rural Korean population. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54:5466–5471. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12478. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitale S., Ellwein L., Cotch M.F., Ferris F.L., Sperduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999–2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1111–1119. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.8.1111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams K.M., Verhoeven V., Cumberland P.M., Bertelsen G., Wolfram C., Buitendijk G.H.S., Hofman A., Van Duijn C.M., Vingerling J.R., Kuijpers R.W.A.M., et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: The European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2015;30:305–315. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lundberg K., Thykjaer A.S., Hansen R.S., Vestergaard A.H., Jacobsen N., Goldschmidt E., Lima R.A., Peto T., Wedderkopp N., Grauslund J. Physical activity and myopia in Danish children-The CHAMPS Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:134–141. doi: 10.1111/aos.13513. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources