Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 28;59(2):254.
doi: 10.3390/medicina59020254.

Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrillation: From the Thromboembolic Risk to the Anticoagulant Treatment Response

Affiliations
Review

Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrillation: From the Thromboembolic Risk to the Anticoagulant Treatment Response

Anna Rago et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with an increased thromboembolic risk. The impact of the female sex as an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events in AF is still debated. Background and Objectives: The aim of this review is to evaluate the gender-related differences in cardioembolic risk and response to anticoagulants among AF patients. Materials and Methods: The PubMed database is used to review the reports about gender differences and thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation. Results: Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represent the gold standard for thromboembolic risk prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Despite a similar rate of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) among men and women in NOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) treatment, the use of NOACs in AF women is associated with a lower risk of intracranial bleeding, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality than in men. Conclusions: The female sex can be defined as a stroke risk modifier rather than a stroke risk factor since it mainly increases the thromboembolic risk in the presence of other risk factors. Further studies about the efficacy and safety profile of NOACs according to sex are needed to support clinicians in performing the most appropriate and tailored anticoagulant therapy, either in male or female AF patients.

Keywords: anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; female sex; gender-differences; thromboembolic risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bertaglia E., Anselmino M., Zorzi A., Russo V., Toso E., Peruzza F., Rapacciuolo A., Migliore F., Gaita F., Cucchini U., et al. Stabile G NOACs and atrial fibrillation: Incidence and predictors of left atrial thrombus in the real world. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017;249:179–183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ko D., Rahman F., Schnabel R.B., Yin X., Benjamin E., Christophersen I.E. Atrial fibrillation in women: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and prognosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2016;13:321–332. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.45. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel M.R., Mahaffey K.W., Garg J., Pan G., Singer D.E., Hacke W., Breithardt G., Halperin J.L., Hankey G.J., Piccini J.P., et al. Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:883–891. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connolly S.J., Ezekowitz M.D., Yusuf S., Eikelboom J., Oldgren J., Parekh A., Pogue J., Reilly P.A., Themeles E., Varrone J., et al. Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1139–1151. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561. Erratum in N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1877. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giugliano R.P., Ruff C.T., Braunwald E., Murphy S.A., Wiviott S.D., Halperin J.L., Waldo A.L., Ezekowitz M.D., Weitz J.I., Špinar J., et al. Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:2093–2104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310907. - DOI - PubMed