Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 31;11(2):350.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020350.

Methods for Fungicide Efficacy Screenings: Multiwell Testing Procedures for the Oomycetes Phytophthora infestans and Pythium ultimum

Affiliations

Methods for Fungicide Efficacy Screenings: Multiwell Testing Procedures for the Oomycetes Phytophthora infestans and Pythium ultimum

Demetrio Marcianò et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Oomycetes-borne diseases represent a serious problem for agriculture sustainability due to the high use of chemical products employed for their control. In recent years, increasing concerns on side effects associated with fungicide utilization have led to the reduction of the permissible modes of action, with the remaining ones continuously threatened by the increase of resistant strains in the pathogen populations. In this context, it is mandatory to develop new generation fungicides characterized by high specificity towards the target species and low environmental impact to guarantee the sustainability, productivity, and quality of food production. Fungicide discovery is a lengthy and costly process, and despite these urgent needs, poor description and formalization of high-throughput methodologies for screening the efficacy of active compounds are commonly reported for these kinds of organisms. In this study, a comprehensive picture of two high-throughput practices for efficient fungicide screening against plant-pathogenic oomycetes has been provided. Different protocols using multiwell plates were validated on approved crop protection products using Phytophthora infestans and Pythium ultimum as the model species. In addition, detailed statistical inputs useful for the analysis of data related to the efficacy of screenings are included.

Keywords: fungicide efficacy; oomycetes; plant pathogens; statistical analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical scheme of the experimental activities carried out on P. infestans (A) and P. ultimum (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Mean OD620 absorbance values measured in P. infestans sporangia inoculated wells from 0 to 3 dpi (24 h interval) with standard deviation (vertical bars). Lines were obtained through general additive model (GAM) regression fitting using the gam() function in R. (B) Curves obtained from the three-parameters logistic model predictions by analyzing GIP (growth inhibition percentage) indexes calculated for each assay (24 wells, 96 wells, and 9 cm Petri) at given mandipropamid concentrations. Points display GIP values recorded; estimated parameters for each curve are also reported.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) OD620 values recorded from 0 to 4 dpi for P. ultimum mycelial suspensions treated and untreated with metalaxyl M in 96-well microtiter plates. Lines were obtained through general additive model (GAM) regression fitting using the gam() function in R. Letters display significant differences individuated by the Kruskal–Wallis test with LSD post hoc analysis for treated (KW = 11.6, df = 4, p-value = 0.02) and untreated wells (KW = 18.29, df = 4, p-value = 0.001). (B) Regression lines obtained from the MLR model on log-transformed OD values. Light-colored ribbons displaying 95% confidence intervals are reported. Dots show mean values with standard deviations (vertical lines).

Similar articles

References

    1. Benavent-Celma C., López-García N., Ruba T., Ściślak M.E., Street-Jones D., van West P., Woodward S., Witzell J. Current practices and emerging possibilities for reducing the spread of oomycete pathogens in terrestrial and aquatic production systems in the European Union. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2021;40:19–36. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2021.10.001. - DOI
    1. Massi F., Torriani S., Borghi L., Toffolatti S. Fungicide Resistance Evolution and Detection in Plant Pathogens: Plasmopara viticola as a Case Study. Microorganisms. 2021;9:119. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010119. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fones H.N., Bebber D.P., Chaloner T.M., Kay W.T., Steinberg G., Gurr S.J. Threats to global food security from emerging fungal and oomycete crop pathogens. Nat. Food. 2020;1:332–342. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0075-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strassert J.F.H., Jamy M., Mylnikov A.P., Tikhonenkov D.V., Burki F. New Phylogenomic Analysis of the Enigmatic Phylum Telonemia Further Resolves the Eukaryote Tree of Life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019;36:757–765. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Derevnina L., Petre B., Kellner R., Dagdas Y.F., Sarowar M.N., Giannakopoulou A., De la Concepcion J.C., Chaparro-Garcia A., Pennington H.G., Van West P., et al. Emerging oomycete threats to plants and animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016;371:20150459. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0459. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding