Evaluation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes against Common Wireworm Species in Potato Cultivation
- PMID: 36839560
- PMCID: PMC9961910
- DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020288
Evaluation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes against Common Wireworm Species in Potato Cultivation
Abstract
Wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) are common insect pests that attack a wide range of economically important crops including potatoes. The control of wireworms is of prime importance in potato production due to the potential damage of the larvae to tuber quantity and quality. Chemical insecticides, the main control strategy against wireworms, generally fail to provide satisfactory control due to the lack of available chemicals and the soil-dwelling habits of the larvae. In the last decades, new eco-friendly concepts have emerged in the sustainable control of wireworms, one of which is entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs). EPNs are soil-inhabitant organisms and represent an ecological approach to controlling a great variety of soil-dwelling insect pests. In this study, the susceptibility of Agriotes sputator Linnaeus and A. rufipalpis Brullé larvae, the most common wireworm species in potato cultivation in Türkiye, to native EPN strains [Steinernema carpocapsae (Sc_BL22), S. feltiae (Sf_BL24 and Sf_KAY4), and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Hb_KAY10 and Hb_AF12)] were evaluated at two temperatures (25 and 30 °C) in pot experiments. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Hb_AF12 was the most effective strain at 30 °C six days post-inoculation and caused 37.5% mortality to A. rufipalpis larvae. Agriotes sputator larvae were more susceptible to tested EPNs at the same exposure time, and 50% mortality was achieved by two EPNs species, Hb_AF12 and Sc_BL22. All EPN species/strains induced mortality over 70% to both wireworm species at both temperatures at 100 IJs/cm2, 18 days post-treatment. The results suggest that tested EPN species/strains have great potential in the control of A. sputator and A. rufipalpis larvae.
Keywords: Agriotes spp.; Elateridae; Heterorhabditis spp.; Steinernema spp.; beneficial nematodes; biocontrol; potato.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Furlan L., Contiero B., Chiarini F., Colauzzi M., Sartori E., Benvegnù I., Fracasso F., Giandon P. Risk assessment of maize damage by wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) as the first step in implementing IPM and in reducing the environmental impact of soil insecticides. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24:236–251. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7692-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vernon R.S., van Herk W.G. Wireworms as Pests of Potato. In: Alyokhin A., Vincent C., Giordanengo P., editors. Insect Pests of Potato: Global Perspectives on Biology and Management. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2013. pp. 103–164.
-
- Chalfant R.B., Seal D.R. Biology and management of wireworms on sweet potato. In: Jansson R.K., Raman K.V., editors. Sweet Potato Pest Management. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FA, USA: 2019. pp. 303–326. - DOI
-
- Keiser A., Häberli M., Stamp P. Quality deficiencies on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers caused by Rhizoctonia solani, wireworms (Agriotes ssp.) and slugs (Deroceras reticulatum, Arion hortensis) in different farming systems. Field Crop. Res. 2012;128:147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.01.004. - DOI
-
- Jansson R.K., Lecrone S.H. Effects of summer cover crop management on wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae) abundance and damage to potato. J. Econ. Entomol. 1991;84:581–586. doi: 10.1093/jee/84.2.581. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
