Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 5;12(4):706.
doi: 10.3390/plants12040706.

Biocontrol Activity of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants and Their Bioactive Components against Soil-Borne Pathogens

Affiliations
Review

Biocontrol Activity of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants and Their Bioactive Components against Soil-Borne Pathogens

Babett Greff et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Soil-borne phytopathogens can have detrimental effects on both cereal and horticultural crops resulting in serious losses worldwide. Due to their high efficiency and easy applicability, synthetic pesticides are still the primary choice in modern plant disease control systems, but stringent regulations and increasing environmental concerns make the search for sustainable alternatives more pressing than ever. In addition to the incorporation of botanicals into agricultural practices, the diversification of cropping systems with aromatic and medicinal plants is also an effective tool to control plant diseases through providing nutrients and shaping soil microbial communities. However, these techniques are not universally accepted and may negatively affect soil fertility if their application is not thoroughly controlled. Because the biocontrol potential of aromatic and medicinal plants has been extensively examined over the past decades, the present study aims to overview the recent literature concerning the biopesticide effect of secondary metabolites derived from aromatic and medicinal plants on important soil-borne plant pathogens including bacteria, fungi, and nematodes. Most of the investigated herbs belong to the family of Lamiaceae (e.g., Origanum spp., Salvia spp., Thymus spp., Mentha spp., etc.) and have been associated with potent antimicrobial activity, primarily due to their chemical constituents. The most frequently tested organisms include fungi, such as Rhizoctonia spp., Fusarium spp., and Phytophthora spp., which may be highly persistent in soil. Despite the intense research efforts dedicated to the development of plant-based pesticides, only a few species of aromatic herbs are utilized for the production of commercial formulations due to inconsistent efficiency, lack of field verification, costs, and prolonged authorization requirements. However, recycling the wastes from aromatic and medicinal plant-utilizing industries may offer an economically feasible way to improve soil health and reduce environmental burdens at the same time. Overall, this review provides comprehensive knowledge on the efficiency of aromatic herb-based plant protection techniques, and it also highlights the importance of exploiting the residues generated by aromatic plant-utilizing sectors as part of agro-industrial processes.

Keywords: aromatic plant; biopesticide; essential oil; herb; soil-borne pathogen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aromatic and medicinal plants as part of non-chemical plant protections systems: effects and methods of application. The icons in circles were made by Blackwoods, Freepik, Kerismaker, and Surang (www.flaticon.com). The plant illustration on the left is based on the work of Mariya Kazakova (purchased from www.shutterstock.com).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Post-extraction lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) waste; (b) Antifungal effect of lavender waste extracts on phytopathogenic Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Photographs taken by Babett Greff.

References

    1. Gomiero T. Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: Reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability. 2016;8:281. doi: 10.3390/su8030281. - DOI
    1. Nambiar K.K.M., Gupta A.P., Fu Q.L., Li S. Biophysical, chemical and socio-economic indicators for assessing agricultural sustainability in the Chinese coastal zone. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001;87:209–214. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00279-1. - DOI
    1. Trivedi P., Delgado-Baquerizo M., Anderson I.C., Singh B.K. Response of soil properties and microbial communities to agriculture: Implications for primary productivity and soil health indicators. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:990. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00990. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turmel M.S., Speratti A., Baudron F., Verhulst N., Govaerts B. Crop residue management and soil health: A systems analysis. Agric. Syst. 2015;134:6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.009. - DOI
    1. Congreves K.A., Hayes A., Verhallen E.A., Van Eerd L.L. Long-term impact of tillage and crop rotation on soil health at four temperate agroecosystems. Soil Tillage Res. 2015;152:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.03.012. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources