Regional differences in the cat caudate nucleus as to the effectiveness in inducing contraversive head-turning by electrical stimulation
- PMID: 3684006
- DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(87)90038-1
Regional differences in the cat caudate nucleus as to the effectiveness in inducing contraversive head-turning by electrical stimulation
Abstract
An attempt was made to re-examine regional differences in the cat caudate nucleus as to the effectiveness in inducing contraversive head-turning by electrical stimulation and to analyze the time course of head-turning quantitatively. In 5 of the total 9 cats, the right sensorimotor cortex and its surrounding areas had been ablated chronically. While the awake, unrestrained cat maintained a stable standing posture facing forward, stimulation was applied systematically to various points in and around the caudate nucleus with a movable stimulating electrode. Trains of stimulating current pulses of less than 300 microA were given, mostly at a rate of 100 Hz for 5 s. In most experiments in which stimulation was given to the side of the intact cerebral cortex, stimulation of caudal portions of the head of the caudate nucleus was effective in inducing contraversive head-turning, but that of its rostral portions was ineffective. In experiments on the side of chronic cortical ablation, similar results were obtained. These results suggested that head-turning induced by stimulation of the caudate nucleus was brought about not by the activation of the corticofugal fibers from these cortical areas by a current spreading to the internal capsule, but by the activation of caudate neurons. Hence, it was demonstrated that there were regional differences in the cat caudate nucleus as to the effectiveness in inducing head-turning. The mean of the shortest latencies of the onset of head-turning for individual stimulation points was 396 ms (S.D., 210 ms) for the side of the intact cerebral cortex, and 454 ms (S.D., 289 ms) for the side of the cortical ablation. Statistically, there was no significant difference between them. Therefore, it was further revealed that the elimination of the sensorimotor cortex did not affect the caudate-induced head-turning in terms of the latency of its onset.
Similar articles
-
EMG activities of neck muscles underlying lateral flexion of the neck during head-turning induced by electrical stimulation of the caudate nucleus in cats.Neurosci Res. 1989 Jun;6(5):397-410. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(89)90002-3. Neurosci Res. 1989. PMID: 2771199
-
Behavioral responses induced by electrical stimulation of the caudate nucleus in freely moving cats.Behav Brain Res. 1993 Oct 21;57(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90056-v. Behav Brain Res. 1993. PMID: 8292258
-
Stimulation of the caudate nucleus induces contraversive saccadic eye movements as well as head turning in the cat.Neurosci Res. 1991 Oct;12(1):287-92. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(91)90118-i. Neurosci Res. 1991. PMID: 1660987
-
[Influence of GABA-ergic substances on the effects of caudate nucleus stimulation and fenamin stereotyping in cats].Farmakol Toksikol. 1980 Mar-Apr;43(2):140-4. Farmakol Toksikol. 1980. PMID: 7002589 Review. Russian.
-
Why do we have a caudate nucleus?Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2010;70(1):95-105. doi: 10.55782/ane-2010-1778. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2010. PMID: 20407491 Review.
Cited by
-
Striatal mechanisms underlying movement, reinforcement, and punishment.Physiology (Bethesda). 2012 Jun;27(3):167-77. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00004.2012. Physiology (Bethesda). 2012. PMID: 22689792 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of caudate nucleus stimulation on substantia nigra cell activity in monkey.Exp Brain Res. 1993;95(3):457-72. doi: 10.1007/BF00227139. Exp Brain Res. 1993. PMID: 8224072
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous