Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr;164(5):812-827.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment and Precision Approaches to Screening: Brave New World or Worlds Apart?

Affiliations
Review

Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment and Precision Approaches to Screening: Brave New World or Worlds Apart?

Fay Kastrinos et al. Gastroenterology. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Current colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations take a "one-size-fits-all" approach using age as the major criterion to initiate screening. Precision screening that incorporates factors beyond age to risk stratify individuals could improve on current approaches and optimally use available resources with benefits for patients, providers, and health care systems. Prediction models could identify high-risk groups who would benefit from more intensive screening, while low-risk groups could be recommended less intensive screening incorporating noninvasive screening modalities. In addition to age, prediction models incorporate well-established risk factors such as genetics (eg, family CRC history, germline, and polygenic risk scores), lifestyle (eg, smoking, alcohol, diet, and physical inactivity), sex, and race and ethnicity among others. Although several risk prediction models have been validated, few have been systematically studied for risk-adapted population CRC screening. In order to envisage clinical implementation of precision screening in the future, it will be critical to develop reliable and accurate prediction models that apply to all individuals in a population; prospectively study risk-adapted CRC screening on the population level; garner acceptance from patients and providers; and assess feasibility, resources, cost, and cost-effectiveness of these new paradigms. This review evaluates the current state of risk prediction modeling and provides a roadmap for future implementation of precision CRC screening.

Keywords: Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment; Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Models; Polygenic Risk Scores; Precision Colorectal Cancer Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Current and Proposed Precision CRC Screening Paradigms
*Fecal testing: Fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT) or multi-target stool DNA testing; **Fecal testing or other future non-invasive testing options

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roberts MC. Implementation Challenges for Risk-Stratified Screening in the Era of Precision Medicine. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(11):1484–1485. - PubMed
    1. Robertson DJ, Ladabaum U. Opportunities and Challenges in Moving From Current Guidelines to Personalized Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(4):904–917. - PubMed
    1. Wang K, Ma W, Wu K, et al. Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Colonoscopy Screening According to Individuals' Risk Profiles. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(9):1177–1185. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levin TR, Corley DA, Jensen CD, et al. Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(5):1383–1391 e1385. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(12):713–732. - PubMed

Publication types