Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 25;27(1):75.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2.

Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?

Affiliations
Review

Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?

Michele Salvagno et al. Crit Care. .

Erratum in

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot in scientific writing. ChatGPT is a type of chatbot, developed by OpenAI, that uses the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) language model to understand and respond to natural language inputs. AI chatbot and ChatGPT in particular appear to be useful tools in scientific writing, assisting researchers and scientists in organizing material, generating an initial draft and/or in proofreading. There is no publication in the field of critical care medicine prepared using this approach; however, this will be a possibility in the next future. ChatGPT work should not be used as a replacement for human judgment and the output should always be reviewed by experts before being used in any critical decision-making or application. Moreover, several ethical issues arise about using these tools, such as the risk of plagiarism and inaccuracies, as well as a potential imbalance in its accessibility between high- and low-income countries, if the software becomes paying. For this reason, a consensus on how to regulate the use of chatbots in scientific writing will soon be required.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Chatbots; Machine learning; Scientific writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of a summary of the existing literature on a specific topic

Comment in

References

    1. King MR. The future of AI in medicine: a perspective from a Chatbot. Ann Biomed Eng. 2022;51:291–295. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-03121-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hutson M. Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature Nature Research. 2022;611:192–193. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suverein MM, Delnoij TSR, Lorusso R, Bruinsma GJBB, Otterspoor L, Kraemer CVE, et al. Early extracorporeal CPR for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. New Engl J Med. 2023;388:299–309. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204511. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel SB, Lam K. ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries? Lancet Digit Health. 2023 doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023;613:423–423. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources