Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 25;13(1):3285.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30119-8.

Horses discriminate human body odors between fear and joy contexts in a habituation-discrimination protocol

Affiliations

Horses discriminate human body odors between fear and joy contexts in a habituation-discrimination protocol

Plotine Jardat et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Animals are widely believed to sense human emotions through smell. Chemoreception is the most primitive and ubiquitous sense, and brain regions responsible for processing smells are among the oldest structures in mammalian evolution. Thus, chemosignals might be involved in interspecies communication. The communication of emotions is essential for social interactions, but very few studies have clearly shown that animals can sense human emotions through smell. We used a habituation-discrimination protocol to test whether horses can discriminate between human odors produced while feeling fear vs. joy. Horses were presented with sweat odors of humans who reported feeling fear or joy while watching a horror movie or a comedy, respectively. A first odor was presented twice in successive trials (habituation), and then, the same odor and a novel odor were presented simultaneously (discrimination). The two odors were from the same human in the fear or joy condition; the experimenter and the observer were blinded to the condition. Horses sniffed the novel odor longer than the repeated odor, indicating they discriminated between human odors produced in fear and joy contexts. Moreover, differences in habituation speed and asymmetric nostril use according to odor suggest differences in the emotional processing of the two odors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Habituation–discrimination protocol. (a) Schematic representation of the experimental set-up. (b) Photographs showing sample presentation. Photograph courtesy of Plotine Jardat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of a subject using her left or right nostril to sniff the sample. Photograph courtesy of Plotine Jardat.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Emotion ratings reported by the participants after watching the fear- and joy-inducing videos. (a) Ratings for ‘fearful’. (b) Ratings for ‘joyful’. Boxplots show the median, first and third quartiles. Permutation tests, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Habituation and discrimination to the samples. (a) Habituation and discrimination of all horses. (b) Habituation according to the type of odor (e.g., group). The graphs are extracted from the corresponding models presented in Table 2. The error bars represent the standard errors from the models. ***p ≤ 0.001, ns: p > 0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Differential use of the left and right nostrils when sniffing odors. The graphs are extracted from the corresponding models presented in Table 2 (see “Methods” section). The error bars represent the standard errors from the models. *p ≤ 0.01,**p ≤ 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Semin GR, Scandurra A, Baragli P, Lanatà A, D’Aniello B. Inter- and intra-species communication of emotion: Chemosignals as the neglected medium. Animals. 2019;9:887. doi: 10.3390/ani9110887. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Désiré L, Boissy A, Veissier I. Emotions in farm animals: A new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behav. Processes. 2002;60:165–180. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00081-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Briefer EF, Le Comber S. Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence. J. Zool. 2012;288:1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00920.x. - DOI
    1. Jardat P, Lansade L. Cognition and the human–animal relationship: a review of the sociocognitive skills of domestic mammals toward humans. Anim. Cogn. 2022;25:369–384. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01557-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galvan, M. & Vonk, J. Man’s other best friend: domestic cats (F. silvestris catus) and their discrimination of human emotion cues. Anim. Cogn.19, 193–205 (2016). - PubMed

Publication types