Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May:182:109582.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109582. Epub 2023 Feb 25.

Dosimetric benefit of a library of plans versus single-plan strategy for pre-operative gastric cancer radiotherapy

Margot Bleeker  1 , Jorrit Visser  2 , Karin Goudschaal  2 , Arjan Bel  2 , Maarten C C M Hulshof  2 , Jan-Jakob Sonke  3 , Astrid van der Horst  3
Affiliations
Free article

Dosimetric benefit of a library of plans versus single-plan strategy for pre-operative gastric cancer radiotherapy

Margot Bleeker et al. Radiother Oncol. 2023 May.
Free article

Abstract

Background and purpose: The stomach experiences large volume and shape changes during pre-operative gastric radiotherapy. This study evaluates the dosimetric benefit for organs-at-risk (OARs) of a library of plans (LoP) compared to the traditional single-plan (SP) strategy.

Materials and methods: Twelve patients who received SP CBCT-guided pre-operative gastric radiotherapy (45 Gy; 25 fractions) were included. Clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of CTVstomach (i.e., stomach + 10 mm uniform margin minus OARs) and CTVLN (i.e., regional lymph node stations). For LoP, five stomach volumes (approximately equidistant with fixed volumes) were created using a previously developed stomach deformation model (volume = 150-750 mL). Appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated for CTVstomach (SP and LoP, separately) and CTVLN. Treatment plans were automatically generated/optimized and the best-fitting library plan was manually selected for each daily CBCT. OARs (i.e., liver, kidneys, heart, spleen, spinal canal) doses were accumulated and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were evaluated.

Results: The non-isotropic PTVstomach margins were significantly (p < 0.05) smaller for LoP than SP (median = 13.1 vs 19.8 mm). For each patient, the average PTV was smaller using a LoP (difference range 134-1151 mL). For all OARs except the kidneys, DVH parameters were significantly reduced using a LoP. Differences in mean dose (Dmean) for liver, heart and spleen ranged between -1.8 to 5.7 Gy. For LoP, a benefit of heart Dmean > 4 Gy and spleen Dmean > 2 Gy was found in 4 and 5 patients, respectively.

Conclusion: A LoP strategy for pre-operative gastric cancer reduced average PTV and reduced OAR dose compared to a SP strategy, thereby potentially reducing risks for radiation-induced toxicities.

Keywords: Adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT guidance; Dose accumulation; Gastric cancer; Library of plans.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources