People solve rebuses unwittingly-Both forward and backward: Empirical evidence for the mental effectiveness of the signifier

Abstract

Introduction: Freud proposed that names of clinically salient objects or situations, such as for example a beetle (Käfer) in Mr. E's panic attack, refer through their phonological word form, and not through their meaning, to etiologically important events-here, "Que faire?" which summarizes the indecisiveness of Mr. E's mother concerning her marriage with Mr. E's father. Lacan formalized these ideas, attributing full-fledged mental effectiveness to the signifier, and summarized this as "the unconscious structured as a language". We tested one aspect of this theory, namely that there is an influence of the ambiguous phonological translation of the world upon our mental processing without us being aware of this influence.

Methods: For this, we used a rebus priming paradigm, including 14 French rebuses, composed of two images depicting common objects, such as paon /pã/ "peacock" and terre /tεr/ "earth," together forming the rebus panthère /pãtεr/ "panther." These images were followed by a target word semantically related to the rebus resolution, e.g., félin "feline," upon which the participants, unaware of the rebus principle, produced 6 written associations. A total of 1,458 participants were randomly assigned either to Experiment 1 in which they were shown the rebus images in either forward or in reverse order or to Experiment 2, in which they were shown only one of both rebus images, either the first or the last.

Results and discussion: The results show that the images induced inadvertent rebus priming in naïve participants. In other words, our results show that people solve rebuses unwittingly independent of stimulus order, thereby constituting empirical evidence for the mental effectiveness of the signifier.

Keywords: Freud; Lacan; Shevrin; phonological priming; rebus; signifier.

FIGURE 1

Rebuses from Shevrin and Luborsky (1961) and from Steinig et al. (2017). (Left) The penny rebus composed of the image of a pen and of a knee from the Shevrin and Luborsky (1961) experiment; (right) the rebus kampflos (without a fight) composed of the image a comb (Kamm) and of a raft (Floß) from the Steinig et al. (2017) experiment.

FIGURE 2

Example of an experimental stimulus composed of the target word félin “feline” and the images of paon /pã/ “peacock” and the image of terre /tεr/ “earth”; composing the French rebus panthère /pãtεr/ “panther”.

FIGURE 3

Variations for an experimental stimulus: félin—paon terre; composed by the images of paon /pã/ “peacock” and of terre /tεr/ “earth” giving the French rebus panthère /pãtεr/ “panther” and the target word associated to panthère: félin /felεϸ / “feline,” declined in the FW (forward) and RV (reverse) variations of Experiment 1 and in the MNI and MNII variations of Experiment 2.

FIGURE 4

Fixed effects plots: linear predictor of the rebus resolution score (RR logit scale) for the condition experimental (EX) versus control (CR) and standard error for EX and CR conditions in the FW (forward) and RV (reverse) variations of Experiment 1 and EX and CR conditions in the MNI and MNII variations MNII (with only one of the two rebus images, respectively the first and the last) of Experiment 2.

FIGURE 5

Bar-plot for the %RR (percentual rebus resolution) upon target word presentation in the EX (experimental—white bars) and CR (control—black bars) conditions of Experiment 1 and of Experiment 2.