Legal Limits Relaxed: Time to Look at Other Barriers Faced by Women Seeking Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Anomalies
- PMID: 36843792
- PMCID: PMC9948682
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34144
Legal Limits Relaxed: Time to Look at Other Barriers Faced by Women Seeking Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Anomalies
Abstract
Introduction Advancements in prenatal diagnostic techniques have led to an increase in demand for termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies (TOPFA). While relaxation in the legal gestational age limits across various countries relieves an important barrier, there is a need to identify the reasons that lead to delays in seeking abortion for fetal anomalies, because abortion-related complications increase with gestational age. Methods In this hospital-based qualitative study, antenatal women referred to a tertiary care institute in North India because of major fetal anomalies were explained about the study. Those women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited after taking consent. Details of antenatal care and prenatal tests were recorded. An in-depth inquiry was made into the reasons for the delay in prenatal tests, the delay in the decision for abortion, and specific problems that they faced in seeking TOPFA. Results Out of 80 women who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate, more than 75% had received antenatal care in public healthcare facilities. Less than 50% of women received folic acid in the first trimester while 26% had first contact with healthcare facilities in the second trimester. Only 21 women underwent screening for common aneuploidies. Second-trimester anomaly scan was delayed in 35 women due to women-centered reasons (n = 17) or provider-centered (n = 19) reasons. Only 37.5% of women were counseled about fetal anomalies by their primary care provider. Owing to delay at multiple levels, 40 women (50%) could receive counseling about fetal abnormality for the first time after 20 weeks. These women could not be offered abortion because this study was carried out before the amendments in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act in India. The older act allowed abortion up to 20 weeks of gestation. Seventeen women could obtain permission for an abortion from a court of law. Arrangements for travel and stay and dependence on family members were the main problems faced by women seeking TOPFA. Conclusions Delay in diagnosis of a fetal anomaly due to delay in seeking antenatal care, irregular follow-up, and lack of pre-test counseling are the major reasons for the delay in the decision for abortion. This is further compounded by inadequate post-test counseling. Lack of awareness, failure or delay in counseling, need to travel to another facility for abortion, dependence on family members, and financial issues are the major barriers.
Keywords: abortion law; barriers to abortion; delay to diagnosis; elective abortion; fetal anomalies.
Copyright © 2023, Singla et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Surgical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: what role can an independent abortion service provider play?J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Aug;39(6):799-804. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1568973. Epub 2019 Apr 19. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019. PMID: 30999795
-
The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion.Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 Jan-Feb;32(1):4-13. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000. PMID: 10710701
-
Fetal anomaly diagnosis and termination of pregnancy in Ireland: a service evaluation following implementation of abortion services in 2019.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Oct;5(10):101111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101111. Epub 2023 Jul 31. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 37532025
-
Role of magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with mild or moderate ventriculomegaly in the era of fetal neurosonography: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):164-171. doi: 10.1002/uog.20197. Epub 2019 Jul 11. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30549340
-
Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Sep;31(9):875-881. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34307-9. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009. PMID: 19941713 Review. English, French.
References
-
- Prenatal diagnosis and abortion for congenital abnormalities: is it ethical to provide one without the other? Ballantyne A, Newson A, Luna F, Ashcroft R. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9:48–56. - PubMed
-
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, Act No. 34, 1971. 2016. https://main.mohfw.gov.in/acts-rules-and-standards-health-sector/acts/mt... https://main.mohfw.gov.in/acts-rules-and-standards-health-sector/acts/mt...
-
- Ministry of Law and Justice. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021. https://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2021/226130.pdf The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act. 2021;8:26032021–26226130.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous