Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 9:10:1049157.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1049157. eCollection 2023.

The accelerated waning of immunity and reduced effect of booster in patients treated with bDMARD and tsDMARD after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination

Affiliations

The accelerated waning of immunity and reduced effect of booster in patients treated with bDMARD and tsDMARD after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination

Selma Tobudic et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the duration of humoral responses after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with inflammatory joint diseases and IBD and booster vaccination compared with healthy controls. It also aimed to analyze factors influencing the quantity and quality of the immune response.

Methods: We enrolled 41 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 35 with seronegative spondyloarthritis (SpA), and 41 suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), excluding those receiving B-cell-depleting therapies. We assessed total anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (Abs) and neutralizing Ab titers 6 months after two and then after three doses of mRNA vaccines compared with healthy controls. We analyzed the influence of therapies on the humoral response.

Results: Patients receiving biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) showed reduced anti-SARS-CoV-2 S Abs and neutralizing Ab titers compared with HC or patients receiving conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs 6 months after the first two vaccination doses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers of patients with b/tsDMARDs declined more rapidly, leading to a significant reduction in the duration of vaccination-induced immunity after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. While 23% of HC and 19% of patients receiving csDMARDs were without detectable neutralizing Abs 6 months after the first two vaccination doses, this number was 62% in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs and 52% in patients receiving a combination of csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs. Booster vaccination led to increased anti-SARS-CoV-2 S Abs in all HC and patients. However, anti-SARS-CoV-2 S Abs after booster vaccination was diminished in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs, either alone or in combination with csDMARDs compared to HC.

Conclusion: Patients receiving b/tsDMARDs have significantly reduced Abs and neutralizing Ab titers 6 months after mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. This was due to a faster decline in Ab levels, indicating a significantly reduced duration of vaccination-induced immunity compared with HC or patients receiving csDMARDs. In addition, they display a reduced response to a booster vaccination, warranting earlier booster vaccination strategies in patients under b/tsDMARD therapy, according to their specific Ab levels.

Keywords: IBD; SARS-CoV-2; arthritis; bDMARD; humoral immune response; immunomodulatory therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PM reports speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis and research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD, and UCB outside of the submitted work. KS reports a research grant from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. HH received grants from Glock Health, BlueSky Immunotherapies, and Neutrolis. HB received consulting fees from MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Gilead, speaker fees from Shionogi, Pfizer, MSD, advisory boards for Valneva, MSD, Gilead. DA reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, SoBi, Sanofi, other from Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, outside the submitted work. SB reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. ES reports supports for attendance of meetings from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Analysis of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers 6 months after the first two vaccination doses in HC (n = 85) and patients with inflammatory arthritis (n = 75) and inflammatory bowel disease (n = 41). (B) Analysis of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers 6 months after the first two vaccination doses comparing different treatment classes HC (n = 85), csDMARD (n = 30), b/tsDMARD (n = 54), and a combination of csDMARD and b/tsDMARD (n = 28). (C) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers 6 months after the first two vaccination doses in patients with IBD and inflammatory arthritis according to the specific immunomodulatory treatments. HC (n = 85), methotrexate monotherapy (MTX mono; n = 19), tumor necrosis alpha-inhibitors (TNFi; n = 48), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i; n = 7), Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi; n = 4), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri; n = 3), interleukine-12/23 inhibitor (IL-12/23i n = 7). (D) Determination of neutralizing antibody activity in sera of HC (n = 56) and patients with inflammatory arthritis (n = 75) receiving the indicated therapies. Statistics used: Kruskal–Wallis test and subsequent Dunn’s test, adjusting for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. ns: non significant p > 0.05; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.005; and ****p ≤ 0.001.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Rate of decline in anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers at a given peak antibody titer according to the indicated treatment: b/tsDMARDs (n = 54; light blue) and a combination of csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs (n = 28; green) in patients vs. HC (n = 85; gray). Colored lines indicate linear regression. Thick colored lines indicate the mean slopes of the indicated patient group or HC. Indicated p-values are derived from a linear regression model with the estimated decrease (BAU/ml/day) as predicted variable and initial anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers, therapy, and age as independent variables. Statistics used: Kruskal–Wallis test and subsequent Dunn’s test. (B) Decline of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers from peak levels after the second immunization and the 6-month time point in HC (n = 85; green) and patients receiving csDMARDs (n = 23; blue), b/tsDMARDs (n = 47; gray), and a combination of csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs (n = 14; yellow). Thick colored lines indicate the mean slopes of the indicated patient group or HC. ns: non significant p > 0.05; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.005; and ****p ≤ 0.001.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Estimation of median days above 300 BAU/ml in HC or inflammatory arthritis patients or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients receiving the indicated treatments: csDMARD (n = 30), b/tsDMARD (n = 54), and a combination of csDMARD and b/tsDMARD (n = 28) compared with healthy controls. Statistics used: Kruskal–Wallis test and subsequent Dunn’s test. ns: non significant p > 0.05; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.005; and ****p ≤ 0.001.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
(A) Comparison of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody levels before and after a third immunization with an mRNA vaccination in HC (n = 40) vs. patients (n = 58) (Mann–Whitney U-test). (B) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody levels after the third immunization of patients with Inflammatory arthritis (n = 38) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; n = 20) receiving csDMARDs (n = 16), b/tsDMARDs (n = 26), or a combination of both (n = 13). Statistics used: Kruskal–Wallis test and subsequent Dunn’s test. ns: non significant p > 0.05; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.005; and ****p ≤ 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baden LR, Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med. (2021) 384:403–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Folegatti PM, Ewer KJ, Aley PK, Angus B, Becker S, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2020) 396:467–78. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31604-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:2603–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramasamy MN, Minassian AM, Ewer KJ, Flaxman AL, Folegatti PM, Owens DR, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. (2021) 396:1979–93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32466-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh EE, Jr RW, Falsey AR, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based Covid-19 vaccine candidates. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:2439–50. 10.1056/NEJMoa2027906 - DOI - PMC - PubMed