Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 13;8(7):6959-6967.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07780. eCollection 2023 Feb 21.

Highly Efficient Recovery and Recycling of Cobalt from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using an N-Methylurea-Acetamide Nonionic Deep Eutectic Solvent

Affiliations

Highly Efficient Recovery and Recycling of Cobalt from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using an N-Methylurea-Acetamide Nonionic Deep Eutectic Solvent

Subramanian Suriyanarayanan et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

The growing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) for the electronic and automobile industries combined with the limited availability of key metal components, in particular cobalt, drives the need for efficient methods for the recovery and recycling of these materials from battery waste. Herein, we introduce a novel and efficient approach for the extraction of cobalt, and other metal components, from spent LiBs using a nonionic deep eutectic solvent (ni-DES) comprised of N-methylurea and acetamide under relatively mild conditions. Cobalt could be recovered from lithium cobalt oxide-based LiBs with an extraction efficiency of >97% and used to fabricate new batteries. The N-methylurea was found to act as both a solvent component and a reagent, the mechanism of which was elucidated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Schematic Representation Denoting the Recovery and Recycling of Cobalt from the Cathode Materials of Spent LiBs
(A) Dismantlement of discharged LiB to separate cathode layers; (B) sonication of cathode layers in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP); (B′) separation of the aluminum layer; (C) centrifugation; (D) removal of supernatant NMP containing the PvDF binder; (E) drying of the pelleted cathode material (LCO) in a hot air oven at 120 °C for 2 h; (F) dispersion of collected LCO in NMU-A ni-DES; (G) heat treatment of collected LCO with NMU-A ni-DES at 180 °C for 24 h; (G′) dissolution of the leachate in 1% acetic acid, followed by the addition of KNO3 (0.1 M) and the electrodeposition of cobalt hydroxide (see section 4.2.9); (H) dissolution of the leachate in Milli-Q grade water, followed by centrifugation to recover the cobaltous precipitate and drying in a hot air oven at 120 °C for 12 h; (I) calcination of the recovered cobaltous powder at 500 °C for 5 h; (J) addition of the required amount of lithium hydroxide, followed by calcination at 500 °C for 5 h; and (K) fabrication of a new LiB (see section 4.2.10).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Extraction of cobalt from LiCoO2 using various ni-DESs comprising acetamide and urea derivatives. Briefly, 20 mg of the LCO powder was dispersed in 2 mL of the ni-DES, and the mixture was heated at 180 °C for 24 h (photograph taken directly after removal from the heating source).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Color change observed upon heating LiCoO2 in NMU-A ni-DES at 50–180 °C (±3 °C) for 24 h. (B) Extraction efficiency of cobalt as determined by the ICP-AES measurement upon heating LiCoO2 at different temperatures in NMU-A ni-DES for 24 h.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Self-reaction of NMU when heated above 100 °C.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Infrared spectra of pure NMU and the NMU after heating containing the biuret derivative.
Figure 5
Figure 5
IR spectra of extracted, annealed (120 °C for 12 h), and calcinated (500 °C for 5 h) cobaltous powder extracted from LCO using the NMU-A ni-DES. For comparison, the IR spectrum of pure Co(OH)2 (β-form) is also given.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Image, (B) electron micrograph, (C) powder XRD pattern, and (D and E) binding energy profiles (Co 2p and Li 1s, respectively) of recovered cobalt oxide.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Galvanostatic charge–discharge profile (inset shows the fabricated coin cell) and (B) cycling stability of a LCO-R coin cell at a 0.2 C rate (inset shows the coin cell testing).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baum Z. J.; Bird R. E.; Yu X.; Ma J. Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling—Overview of Techniques and Trends. ACS Energy Letters 2022, 7, 712–719. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02602. - DOI
    2. Armand M.; Axmann P.; Bresser D.; Copley M.; Edström K.; Ekberg C.; Guyomard D.; Lestriez B.; Novák P.; Petranikova M.; et al. Lithium-ion batteries – Current state of the art and anticipated developments. J. Power Sources 2020, 479, 22870810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228708. - DOI
    1. McKerracher C.; O’Donovan A.; Soulopoulos N.; Grant A.; Mi S.; Doherty D.; Fisher R.; Cantor C.; Lyu J.; Ampofo K.. et al.Electric Vehicle Outlook 2022; BloombergNEF, 2022. https://about.bnef.com/electric-vehicle-outlook/ (accessed 2022 02-10-2022).
    1. Stone M.As electric vehicles take off, we’ll need to recycle their batteries. National Geographic, May 28, 2021. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/electric-vehicles... (accessed 02-10-2022).
    1. Notter D. A.; Gauch M.; Widmer R.; Wäger P.; Stamp A.; Zah R.; Althaus H.-J. Contribution of Li-Ion Batteries to the Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (17), 6550–6556. 10.1021/es903729a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peters J. F.; Baumann M.; Zimmermann B.; Braun J.; Weil M. The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 491–506. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039. - DOI