Comparing Two- and Three-dimensional Antral Follicle Count in Patients with Endometriosis
- PMID: 36844767
- PMCID: PMC9944808
- DOI: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_204_21
Comparing Two- and Three-dimensional Antral Follicle Count in Patients with Endometriosis
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to compare three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound semiautomatic antral follicle count (AFC) with two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound real-time AFC to evaluate patients with deep endometriosis and/or endometrioma submitted to ovarian stimulation (OS).
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study assessing all women with documented diagnosis of deep endometriosis who underwent OS for assisted reproduction treatment. The primary outcome was the difference between AFC by semiautomatic 3D follicle count using 3D volume datasets and 2D ultrasound count with the number of oocytes retrieved at the end of the cycle. The 3D ultrasound AFC was obtained using sonography-based automated volume count (SonoAVC), and the 2D ultrasound AFC data was collected from the electronic medical record.
Results: Total of 36 women had deep endometriosis documented by magnetic resonance imaging, laparoscopy, or ultrasonography and 3D ovarian volume datasets stored from their first exam. The differences between the 2D and 3D AFC and the number of oocytes retrieved at the end of the stimulation were compared, showing no significant statistical difference between both methods (P = 0.59). Correlations were similar using both methods when compared to the number of oocytes retrieved (2D [r = 0.83, confidence interval (CI) = 0.68-0.9, P < 0.001]); (3D [r = 0.81, CI = 0.46-0.83, P < 0.001]).
Conclusion: 3D semiautomatic AFC can be used to access the ovarian reserve in patients with endometriosis.
Keywords: Antral follicle count; assisted reproduction; endometriosis; ovarian reserve; three-dimensional ultrasound.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Medical Ultrasound.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Re C, Mignini Renzini M, Rodriguez A, Dal Canto M, Buccheri M, Sacchi S, et al. From a circle to a sphere: The ultrasound imaging of ovarian follicle with 2D and 3D technology. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35:184–9. - PubMed
-
- De Paula Martins W, Araujo Júnior E. Advanced Topics On Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers; 2016.
-
- Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Clewes J, Joergner I, Bonaki SD, Chamberlain S, et al. SonoAVC: A novel method of automatic volume calculation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:691–6. - PubMed
-
- Deb S, Jayaprakasan K, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of automated antral follicle counts made using three-dimensional ultrasound and SonoAVC. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:477–83. - PubMed
-
- Jayaprakasan K, Hilwah N, Kendall NR, Hopkisson JF, Campbell BK, Johnson IR, et al. Does 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pretreatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment? Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1932–41. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources