Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 8:9:1010001.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1010001. eCollection 2022.

Identifying patients with psychosocial problems in general practice: A scoping review

Rosemarie Schwenker  1 , Tobias Deutsch  2 , Susanne Unverzagt  1 , Thomas Frese  1
Affiliations

Identifying patients with psychosocial problems in general practice: A scoping review

Rosemarie Schwenker et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a scoping review with the aim of comprehensively investigating what tools or methods have been examined in general practice research that capture a wide range of psychosocial problems (PSPs) and serve to identify patients and highlight their characteristics.

Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual on scoping reviews. A systematic search was conducted in four electronic databases (Medline [Ovid], Web of Science Core Collection, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library) for quantitative and qualitative studies in English, Spanish, French, and German with no time limit. The protocol was registered with Open Science Framework and published in BMJ Open.

Results: Of the 839 articles identified, 66 met the criteria for study eligibility, from which 61 instruments were identified. The publications were from 18 different countries, with most studies employing an observational design and including mostly adult patients. Among all instruments, 22 were reported as validated, which we present in this paper. Overall, quality criteria were reported differently, with studies generally providing little detail. Most of the instruments were used as paper and pencil questionnaires. We found considerable heterogeneity in the theoretical conceptualisation, definition, and measurement of PSPs, ranging from psychiatric case findings to specific social problems.

Discussion and conclusion: This review presents a number of tools and methods that have been studied and used in general practice research. Adapted and tailored to local circumstances, practice populations, and needs, they could be useful for identifying patients with PSPs in daily GP practice; however, this requires further research. Given the heterogeneity of studies and instruments, future research efforts should include both a more structured evaluation of instruments and the incorporation of consensus methods to move forward from instrument research to actual use in daily practice.

Keywords: general practice; identification tools; primary care; psychosocial problems; scoping review; social problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. DEGAM. DEGAM-Zukunftspositionen. (2013). Available online at: https://www.degam.de/files/Inhalte/Degam-Inhalte/Ueber_uns/Positionspapi... (accessed July 6, 2021).
    1. Hartmann M, Finkenzeller C, Boehlen F, Wagenlechner P, Peters-Klimm F, Herzog W. Psychosomatische Sprechstunde in der Hausarztpraxis – ein neues Kooperationsmodell von Psychosomatik und Allgemeinmedizin. Balint J. (2018) 19:116–20. 10.1055/a-0795-2048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmermann T, Mews C, Kloppe T, Tetzlaff B, Hadwiger M, von dem Knesebeck O, et al. Soziale Probleme in der hausärztlichen Versorgung – Häufigkeit, Reaktionen, Handlungsoptionen und erwünschter Unterstützungsbedarf aus der Sicht von Hausärztinnen und Hausärzten. [Social problems in primary health care: prevalence, responses, course of action, and the need for support from a general practitioners’ point of view]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. (2018) 131–32:81–9. 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.01.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santo E, Vo M, Uratsu C, Grant R. Patient-defined visit priorities in primary care: psychosocial versus medically-related concerns. J Am Board Fam Med. (2019) 32:513–20. 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180380 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization [WHO]. Social determinants of health. (2019). Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health (accessed March 4, 2022).

Publication types