Preference for Male Risk Takers Varies with Relationship Context and Health Status but not COVID Risk
- PMID: 36845029
- PMCID: PMC9944803
- DOI: 10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3
Preference for Male Risk Takers Varies with Relationship Context and Health Status but not COVID Risk
Abstract
Risk taking is more commonly shown by males than females and has a signalling function, serving to advertise one's intrinsic quality to prospective mates. Previous research has established that male risk takers are judged as more attractive for short-term flings than long-term relationships, but the environmental and socioeconomic context surrounding female preferences for male risk takers has been overlooked. Using a survey instrument, we examined female preferences for male risk takers across 1304 females from 47 countries. We found preferences for physical risk takers to be more pronounced in females with a bisexual orientation and females who scored high on risk proneness. Self-reported health was positively associated with preferences for high risk takers as short-term mates, but the effect was moderated by country-level health, i.e. the association was stronger in countries with poorer health. The security provided by better health and access to health care may allow females to capitalise on the genetic quality afforded by selecting a risk-prone male whilst concurrently buffering the potential costs associated with the risk taker's lower paternal investment. The risk of contracting COVID-19 did not predict avoidance of risk takers, perhaps because this environmental cue is too novel to have moulded our behavioural preferences.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3.
Keywords: COVID; Health; Mate choice; Risk taking; Sexual selection.
© The Author(s) 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing InterestsThe authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1997 May;72(2):283-327. doi: 10.1017/s0006323196005014. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1997. PMID: 9155244 Review.
-
Male mate preferences in mutual mate choice: finches modulate their songs across and within male-female interactions.Anim Behav. 2014 Oct 1;97:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.08.016. Anim Behav. 2014. PMID: 25242817 Free PMC article.
-
Individual differences in preference for risky behaviors during courtship.Scand J Psychol. 2020 Aug;61(4):560-564. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12628. Epub 2020 Feb 27. Scand J Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32103513
-
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):305-39. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005693. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001. PMID: 11569787 Review.
-
A Research Note on the Influence of Relationship Length and Sex on Preferences for Altruistic and Cooperative Mates.Psychol Rep. 2019 Apr;122(2):550-557. doi: 10.1177/0033294118764640. Epub 2018 Apr 4. Psychol Rep. 2019. PMID: 29618294
References
-
- Apalkova Y, Butovskaya ML, Bronnikova N, Burkova V, Shackelford TK, Fink B. Assessment of male physical risk-taking behavior in a sample of Russian men and women. Evolutionary Psychological Science. 2018;4:314–321. doi: 10.1007/s40806-018-0140-1. - DOI
-
- Bacon PM, Conte A, Moffatt PG. Assortative mating on risk attitude. Theory and Decision. 2014;77:389–401. doi: 10.1007/s11238-014-9448-x. - DOI
-
- Baker MD, Jr, Maner JK. Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2008;29:391–395. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.06.001. - DOI
-
- Bassett JF, Moss B. Men and women prefer risk takers as romantic and nonromantic partners. Current Research in Social Psychology. 2004;9:135–144.
-
- Bereczkei T, Csanaky A. Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1996;17:17–35. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00104-2. - DOI
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources