Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 25;8(1):95-102.
doi: 10.1002/lio2.1003. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Adoption of otolaryngologist-head neck surgeons toward transoral robotic surgery: An international survey

Jerome R Lechien  1   2   3   4 , Leonardo Haddad  5 , F Christopher Holsinger  6 , Abie H Mendelsohn  7 , Stephane Hans  1
Affiliations

Adoption of otolaryngologist-head neck surgeons toward transoral robotic surgery: An international survey

Jerome R Lechien et al. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate perception, adoption and awareness of otolaryngologist-head neck surgeons (OTO-HNS) toward transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

Methods: An online survey was sent to 1383 OTO-HNS on the perception, adoption and awareness about TORS to members of many otolaryngological societies. The following aspects were assessed: TORS access; training; awareness/perception; indications and advantages/barriers to TORS practice. The responses were presented for the entire cohort and regarding the TORS experience of OTO-HNS.

Results: A total of 359 completed the survey (26%); including 115 TORS surgeons. TORS-surgeons carry out a mean number of 34.4 annual TORS procedures. The primary barriers to TORS were the cost of the robot (74%) and disposable accessories (69%), and the lack of training opportunity (38%). The 3D view of the surgical field (66%), the postoperative quality of life outcomes (63%) and the shorter hospital stay (56%) were the most important benefits of TORS. TORS-surgeons believed more frequently that TORS is indicated for cT1-T2 oropharyngeal and supraglottic cancers than non-TORS surgeons (p < .005). Participants believed that the priorities for the future consisted of the reduction of the robot arm size and the incorporation of flexible instruments (28%); the integration of laser (25%) or GPS tracking based on imaging (18%), all of them to improve accesses to hypopharynx (24%), supraglottic larynx (23%) and vocal folds (22%).

Conclusions: The perception, adoption and knowledges toward TORS depend on the access to robot. The findings of this survey may help guide decisions on how improve the dissemination of TORS interest and awareness.

Keywords: Transoral; awareness; head neck; otolaryngology; robotic; surgery; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Key points of improvement regarding TORS surgeons. The x axis consists of percentage of TORS surgeons who reported that the proposition is a priority for the future. MRI/CT, magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomodensitometry; NBI, narrow banded imaging; NS, non‐significant; TORS, transoral robotic surgery
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hockstein NG, Nolan JP, O'Malley BW, Woo YJ. Robotic microlaryngeal surgery: a technical feasibility study using the daVinci surgical robot and an airway mannequin. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(5):780‐785. - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y, Li H. A scientometric review of soft robotics: intellectual structures and emerging trends analysis (2010‐2021). Front Robot AI. 2022;9:868682. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.868682 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yver CM, Shimunov D, Weinstein GS, et al. Oncologic and survival outcomes for resectable locally‐advanced HPV‐related oropharyngeal cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery. Oral Oncol. 2021;118:105307. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105307 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carnevale C, Ortiz‐González I, Ortiz‐González A, Bodi‐Blanes L, Til‐Pérez G. Early T1‐T2 stage p16+ oropharyngeal tumours Role of upfront transoral robotic surgery in de‐escalation treatment strategies A review of the current literature. Oral Oncol. 2021;113:105111. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105111 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lechien JR, Fakhry N, Saussez S, et al. Surgical, clinical and functional outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic laryngeal cancers: A systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2020;109:104848. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104848 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources