Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 27:10:e43966.
doi: 10.2196/43966.

Exploring Patient Journey Mapping and the Learning Health System: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Exploring Patient Journey Mapping and the Learning Health System: Scoping Review

Amanda L Joseph et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: Journey maps are visualization tools that can facilitate the diagrammatical representation of stakeholder groups by interest or function for comparative visual analysis. Therefore, journey maps can illustrate intersections and relationships between organizations and consumers using products or services. We propose that some synergies may exist between journey maps and the concept of a learning health system (LHS). The overarching goal of an LHS is to use health care data to inform clinical practice and improve service delivery processes and patient outcomes.

Objective: The purpose of this review was to assess the literature and establish a relationship between journey mapping techniques and LHSs. Specifically, in this study, we explored the current state of the literature to answer the following research questions: (1) Is there a relationship between journey mapping techniques and an LHS in the literature? (2) Is there a way to integrate the data from journey mapping activities into an LHS? (3) How can the data gleaned from journey map activities be used to inform an LHS?

Methods: A scoping review was conducted by querying the following electronic databases: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Ovid), IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost), APA PsycInfo (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and MEDLINE (EBSCOhost). Two researchers applied the inclusion criteria and assessed all articles by title and abstract in the first screen, using Covidence. Following this, a full-text review of included articles was done, with relevant data extracted, tabulated, and assessed thematically.

Results: The initial search yielded 694 studies. Of those, 179 duplicates were removed. Following this, 515 articles were assessed during the first screening phase, and 412 were excluded, as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Next, 103 articles were read in full, and 95 were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 8 articles that satisfied the inclusion criteria. The article sample can be subsumed into 2 overarching themes: (1) the need to evolve service delivery models in health care, and (2) the potential value of using patient journey data in an LHS.

Conclusions: This scoping review demonstrated the gap in knowledge regarding integrating the data from journey mapping activities into an LHS. Our findings highlighted the importance of using the data from patient experiences to enrich an LHS and provide holistic care. To satisfy this gap, the authors intend to continue this investigation to establish the relationship between journey mapping and the concept of LHSs. This scoping review will serve as phase 1 of an investigative series. Phase 2 will entail the creation of a holistic framework to guide and streamline data integration from journey mapping activities into an LHS. Lastly, phase 3 will provide a proof of concept to demonstrate how patient journey mapping activities could be integrated into an LHS.

Keywords: data integration; delivery of health care; health informatics; journey map; learning health care system; learning health system; patient health information; patient journey map; scoping review; service delivery; user experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: AK is editor in chief of JMIR Human Factors. YQ is an editorial board member of JMIR Human Factors. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Five journey mapping techniques adapted from previous studies [1-3].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adaptation of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) data flow diagram detailing article selection during the screening process [12].

References

    1. Joseph AL, Kushniruk AW, Borycki EM. Patient journey mapping: current practices, challenges and future opportunities in healthcare. Knowl Manag e-Learn: Int J. 2020;12(4):386–404. doi: 10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.021. - DOI
    1. Joseph AL, Monkman H, Kushniruk AW. An Evaluation Guide and Decision Support Tool for Journey Maps in Healthcare and Beyond. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 29;295:171–174. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220689.SHTI220689 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalbach J. Mapping Experiences: A Complete Guide to Creating Value through Journeys, Blueprints, and Diagrams. 2nd Edition. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media; 2016. p. 384.
    1. Stickdorn M, Schneider J. This is Service Design Thinking: Basics-Tools-Cases. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. p. 384.
    1. Joseph AL, Monkman H, MacDonald L, Kushniruk AW. Contextualizing Online Laboratory (lab) Results and Mapping the Patient Journey. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 29;295:175–178. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220690.SHTI220690 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types