Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 1;207(9):1183-1193.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.202212-2194OC.

High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury

Affiliations

High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury

Serena Brusatori et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Rationale: In the EOLIA (ECMO to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS) trial, oxygenation was similar between intervention and conventional groups, whereas [Formula: see text]e was reduced in the intervention group. Comparable reductions in ventilation intensity are theoretically possible with low-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R), provided oxygenation remains acceptable. Objectives: To compare the effects of ECCO2R and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamics in animal models of pulmonary (intratracheal hydrochloric acid) and extrapulmonary (intravenous oleic acid) lung injury. Methods: Twenty-four pigs with moderate to severe hypoxemia (PaO2:FiO2 ⩽ 150 mm Hg) were randomized to ECMO (blood flow 50-60 ml/kg/min), ECCO2R (0.4 L/min), or mechanical ventilation alone. Measurements and Main Results: [Formula: see text]o2, [Formula: see text]co2, gas exchange, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics were measured and are presented as 24-hour averages. Oleic acid versus hydrochloric acid showed higher extravascular lung water (1,424 ± 419 vs. 574 ± 195 ml; P < 0.001), worse oxygenation (PaO2:FiO2 = 125 ± 14 vs. 151 ± 11 mm Hg; P < 0.001), but better respiratory mechanics (plateau pressure 27 ± 4 vs. 30 ± 3 cm H2O; P = 0.017). Both models led to acute severe pulmonary hypertension. In both models, ECMO (3.7 ± 0.5 L/min), compared with ECCO2R (0.4 L/min), increased mixed venous oxygen saturation and oxygenation, and improved hemodynamics (cardiac output = 6.0 ± 1.4 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4 L/min; P = 0.003). [Formula: see text]o2 and [Formula: see text]co2, irrespective of lung injury model, were lower during ECMO, resulting in lower PaCO2 and [Formula: see text]e but worse respiratory elastance compared with ECCO2R (64 ± 27 vs. 40 ± 8 cm H2O/L; P < 0.001). Conclusions: ECMO was associated with better oxygenation, lower [Formula: see text]o2, and better hemodynamics. ECCO2R may offer a potential alternative to ECMO, but there are concerns regarding its effects on hemodynamics and pulmonary hypertension.

Keywords: [Formula: see text]O2; [Formula: see text]co2; acute respiratory distress syndrome; high-flow extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; low-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A–C) Time courses of SaO2 (A), PaO2 (B), and pulmonary venous admixture fraction (C) in hydrochloric acid (HCl)–treated and oleic acid (OA)-treated animals according to support method (ECMO in red, ECCO2R in blue, no treatment in gray). Values are represented as mean ± SE. “Baseline” refers to values measured before lung injury (light blue background), “After Injury” refers to values after HCl or OA administration before extracorporeal treatment (light blue background), “1h” to “23h” refer to values recorded during treatment (light pink background), and “End” refers to values measured 1 hour after extracorporeal treatment withdrawal while ventilating the pig with the same setting applied after injury (light blue background). ECCO2R = extracorporeal CO2 removal; ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A and B) Time courses of total pulmonary vascular resistance (A) and respiratory system elastance (B) in hydrochloric acid (HCl)–treated and oleic acid (OA)-treated animals according to method of support (ECMO in red, ECCO2R in blue, no treatment in gray). Values are represented as mean ± SE. “Baseline” refers to values measured before lung injury (light blue background), “After Injury” refers to values after HCl or OA administration before extracorporeal treatment (light blue background), “1h” to “23h” refer to values recorded during treatment (light pink background), and “End” refers to values measured 1 hour after extracorporeal treatment withdrawal while ventilating the pig with the same setting applied after injury (light blue background). ECCO2R = extracorporeal CO2 removal; ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A and B) Time courses of total V˙o2 (A) and total V˙co2 (B) in hydrochloric acid (HCl)–treated and oleic acid (OA)-treated animals according to support method (ECMO in red, ECCO2R in blue, no treatment in gray). Values are represented as mean ± SE. “Baseline” refers to values measured before lung injury (light blue background), “After Injury” refers to values after HCl or OA administration before extracorporeal treatment (light blue background), “1h” to “23h” refer to values recorded during treatment (light pink background), and “End” refers to values measured 1 hour after extracorporeal treatment withdrawal while ventilating the pig with the same setting applied after injury (light blue background). ECCO2R = extracorporeal CO2 removal; ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Trends of physiological variable alterations according to model, technique, and operator. “Model” refers to HCl or oleic acid injury, “Technique” refers to ECMO or ECCO2R application, and “Operator” refers to mechanical ventilator settings chosen by the physicians. ECCO2R = extracorporeal CO2 removal; ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; EVLW = extravascular lung water; HCl = hydrochloric acid; MV = mechanical ventilation; SvO2 = mixed venous oxygen saturation.

Comment in

References

    1. Hill JD, O’Brien TG, Murray JJ, Dontigny L, Bramson ML, Osborn JJ, et al. Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation for acute post-traumatic respiratory failure (shock-lung syndrome): use of the Bramson membrane lung. N Engl J Med . 1972;286:629–634. - PubMed
    1. Zapol WM, Snider MT, Hill JD, Fallat RJ, Bartlett RH, Edmunds LH, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure: a randomized prospective study. JAMA . 1979;242:2193–2196. - PubMed
    1. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, et al. CESAR Trial Collaboration Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet . 2009;374:1351–1363. - PubMed
    1. Davies A, Jones D, Bailey M, Beca J, Bellomo R, Blackwell N, et al. Australia, New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA . 2009;302:1888–1895. - PubMed
    1. Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, et al. EOLIA Trial Group, REVA, and ECMONet Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med . 2018;378:1965–1975. - PubMed

Publication types