Diagnostic delay in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Abstract

Aims: Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) may be challenging, as it comprises diverse phenotypes (right dominant, biventricular, and left dominant), and each may overlap with other clinical entities. The issue of differential diagnosis with conditions mimicking ACM has been previously highlighted; however, a systematic analysis of ACM diagnostic delay, and of its clinical implications, is lacking.

Methods and results: Data of all ACM patients from three Italian Cardiomyopathy Referral Centres were reviewed to assess the time from first medical contact to definitive ACM diagnosis; a significant diagnostic delay was defined as a time to ACM diagnosis ≥2 years. Baseline characteristics and clinical course of patients with and without diagnostic delay were compared. Of 174 ACM patients, 31% experienced diagnostic delay, with a median time to diagnosis of 8 years (20% in right-dominant ACM, 33% in left-dominant ACM, and 39% in biventricular). Patients with diagnostic delay, when compared with those without, more frequently exhibited an ACM phenotype with left ventricular (LV) involvement (74 vs. 57%, P = 0.04) and a specific genetic background (none had plakophilin-2 variants). The most common initial (mis)diagnoses were dilated cardiomyopathy (51%), myocarditis (21%), and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (9%). At follow-up, all-cause mortality was greater in those with diagnostic delay (P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Diagnostic delay is common in patients with ACM, particularly in the presence of LV involvement, and is associated with greater mortality at follow-up. Clinical suspicion and increasing use of tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance in specific clinical settings are of key importance for the timely identification of ACM.

Keywords: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; Biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; Diagnostic delay; Left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.