A systematic review of influences on implementation of supported self-management interventions for people with severe mental health problems in secondary mental health care settings
- PMID: 36848334
- PMCID: PMC9970054
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282157
A systematic review of influences on implementation of supported self-management interventions for people with severe mental health problems in secondary mental health care settings
Abstract
Purpose: There is robust evidence for offering supported self-management interventions for people with severe mental illness (SMI) throughout secondary mental health services, but their availability remains patchy. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the evidence on barriers and facilitators to implementing self-management interventions for people with SMI in secondary mental health care settings.
Methods: The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021257078). Five databases were searched to identify relevant studies. We included full-text journal articles with primary qualitative or quantitative data on factors which affect the implementation of self-management interventions for people with SMI in secondary mental health services. The included studies were analysed using narrative synthesis, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and an established taxonomy of implementation outcomes.
Results: Twenty-three studies from five countries met eligibility criteria. The barriers and facilitators identified in the review were mainly on the organisational level, but included some individual-level influences. Facilitators included high feasibility, high fidelity, a strong team structure, sufficient number of staff, support from colleagues, staff training, supervision, the presence of an implementation champion and adaptability of the intervention. Barriers to implementation include high staff turnover, staff shortage, lack of supervision, lack of support for staff delivering the programme, staff struggling with their increased workload, a lack of senior clinical leadership, and programme content perceived as irrelevant.
Conclusion: The findings from this research suggest promising strategies to improve implementation of self-management interventions. For services providing support for people with SMI, organisational culture should be considered, as well as the adaptability of interventions.
Copyright: © 2023 Islam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Guidelines for the management of physical health conditions in adults with severe mental disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534487/. - PubMed
-
- Evans TS, Berkman N, Brown C, Gaynes B, Weber RP. Disparities within serious mental illness. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) [Internet]; 2016. May [cited 2021 July 20]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK368427/. - PubMed
-
- Recovery Davidson L., self management and the expert patient–changing the culture of mental health from a UK perspective. J Ment Health. 2005;14(1): 25–35.
-
- Taylor S, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, Parke H, Schwappach A et al. A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions (PRISMS Practical systematic RevIew of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions). Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014;2(53): 1–580. - PubMed
-
- National Health Service (NHS). Supported self-management: summary guide [Internet]. England: NHS. 2020. [cited 2021 July 20] Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/supported-self-management-summary....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
