Anterior deltoid muscle reflection using a deltopectoral approach is safe and does not influence outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Abstract

Background: The deltopectoral approach is well accepted for shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The extended deltopectoral approach with detachment of the anterior deltoid from the clavicle allows increased joint exposure and can protect the anterior deltoid from traction injury. The efficacy of this extended approach has been demonstrated in anatomic total shoulder replacement surgery. However, this has not been shown in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the extended deltopectoral approach in RSA. The secondary aim was to evaluate the performance of the deltoid reflection approach in terms of complications and surgical, functional, and radiologic outcomes up to 24 months after surgery.

Methods: A prospective, nonrandomized comparative study was performed between January 2012 and October 2020 including 77 patients in the deltoid reflection group and 73 patients in the comparative group. The decision for inclusion was based on patient and surgeon factors. Complications were recorded. Patients were followed up for ≥24 months to evaluate their shoulder function and undergo ultrasound evaluation. Functional outcome measures included the Oxford Shoulder Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, pain intensity (rated on visual analog scale [VAS] from 0 to 100), and range of motion (forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation). A regression analysis was performed to evaluate any factors of influence on the VAS score.

Results: There were no significant differences in the complication rate between the 2 groups (14.5% in deltoid reflection group and 13.8% in comparative group, P = .915). Ultrasound evaluation was available in 64 patients (83.1%), and no proximal detachment was observed. In addition, there were no significant differences in functional outcome measures both preoperatively and at 24 months after surgery between the groups assessed based on the mean VAS pain score, Oxford Shoulder Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation. Adjustment for possible confounders in a regression model indicated that only prior surgery significantly influenced the VAS pain score after surgery (P = .031; 95% confidence interval, 0.574-11.67). Deltoid reflection (P = .068), age (P = .466), sex (P = .936), use of glenoid graft (P = .091), prosthesis manufacturer (P = .382), and preoperative VAS score (P = .362) were not of influence.

Discussion: The results of this study show that an extended deltopectoral approach for RSA is safe. Selected reflection of the anterior deltoid muscle improved exposure and prevented anterior deltoid muscle injury followed by reattachment. Patients had similar functional scores preoperatively and at 24 months postoperatively compared with a comparative group. Furthermore, ultrasound evaluation showed intact reattachments.

Keywords: Deltopectoral approach; deltoid muscle; deltoid reflection; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; surgical exposure; ultrasound.