Re-sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss, comorbidities and gerd evaluation in a large series with 5 years of follow-up
- PMID: 36849646
- DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01471-1
Re-sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss, comorbidities and gerd evaluation in a large series with 5 years of follow-up
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has rapidly become one of the most commonly performed procedures in bariatric surgery. Weight regain and insufficient weight loss are the most common causes for surgical failure. Re-sleeve gastrectomy (ReSG) can represent an option when there is evidence of a dilated gastric tube.
Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate safety, efficacy and rate of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after ReSG in one of the largest series present in literature with long-term follow up.
Methods and study design: Retrospective study design. From February 2010 to August 2018, 102 patients underwent ReSG at our Centre. We divided patients into two groups, according to the main reason for surgical failure: insufficient weight loss or progressive weight regain.
Results: One hundred-two patients (78 women, 24 men) with BMI 38 ± 6 kg/m2 underwent ReSG (mean age 44 years). Rate of postoperative complications was 3.9% (4/102). After a mean follow-up of 55 months, mean BMI decreased to 30,4 kg/m2 and the mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 51 ± 38.6. Symptoms of GERD were present in 35/102 patients (34.3%) and the need for a new operation occurred in six patients. Forty-five patients were submitted to ReSG for progressive weight regain (group A) and 57 for insufficient weight loss (group B). No differences were found in terms of postoperative BMI and %EWL.
Conclusion: ReSG is a feasible procedure after primary SG failure in selected patients, but its efficacy in reducing the BMI under 30 kg/m2 is still unclear. In addition, over 30% of patients suffer from long-term gastro-esophageal reflux.
Keywords: Residual fundus; Revisional surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy; Weight regain. Re-sleeve gastrectomy. failed sleeve.
© 2023. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
Comment in
-
Letter to the Editor: Re-sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss, comorbidities and gerd evaluation in a large series with 5 years of follow-up.Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1367-1368. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01535-2. Epub 2023 Jun 30. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 37389798 No abstract available.
References
-
- Fezzi M, Kolotkin RL, Nedelcu M, Jaussent A, Schaub R, Chauvet MA, Cassafieres C, Lefebvre P, Renard E, Bringer J, Fabre JM, Nocca D (2011) Improvement in quality of life after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 21(8):1161–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0361-x . (PMID: 21298508) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Topart P, Carles M, Hébuterne X, Gugenheim J (2013) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by duodenal switch in selected patients versus single-stage duodenal switch for superobesity: case-control study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(4):531–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.02.003 . (Epub 2012 Mar 3 PMID: 22498357) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, Pomp A (2003) Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg 13(6):861–864. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089203322618669 . (PMID: 14738671) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Juodeikis Ž, Brimas G (2017) Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(4):693–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.006 . (Epub 2016 Oct 17 PMID: 27876332) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lauti M, Kularatna M, Hill AG, MacCormick AD (2016) Weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy-a systematic review. Obes Surg 26(6):1326–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2152-x . (PMID: 27048439) - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
