Poisoning Regulation, Research, Health, and the Environment: The Glyphosate-Based Herbicides Case in Canada
- PMID: 36850995
- PMCID: PMC9965480
- DOI: 10.3390/toxics11020121
Poisoning Regulation, Research, Health, and the Environment: The Glyphosate-Based Herbicides Case in Canada
Abstract
Despite discourse advocating pesticide reduction, there has been an exponential increase in pesticide use worldwide in the agricultural sector over the last 30 years. Glyphosate-Based Herbicides (GBHs) are the most widely used pesticides on the planet as well as in Canada, where a total of almost 470 million kilograms of declared "active" ingredient glyphosate was sold between 2007 and 2018. GBHs accounted for 58% of pesticides used in the agriculture sector in Canada in 2017. While the independent scientific literature on the harmful health and environmental impacts of pesticides such as GBHs is overwhelming, Canada has only banned 32 "active" pesticide ingredients out of 531 banned in 168 countries, and reapproved GBHs in 2017 until 2032. This article, based on interdisciplinary and intersectoral research, will analyze how as a result of the scientific and regulatory captures of relevant Canadian agencies by the pesticide industry, the Canadian regulation and scientific assessment of pesticides are deficient and lagging behind other countries, using the GBH case as a basis for analysis. It will show how, by embracing industry narratives and biased evidence, by being receptive to industry demands, and by opaque decision making and lack of transparency, Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) promotes commercial interests over the imperatives of public health and environmental protection.
Keywords: Canada; Health Canada; Monsanto; Quebec; environmental health; glyphosate; glyphosate-based-herbicides; herbicide; pesticide; regulation; regulatory capture; scientific evaluation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- IPBES Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) 2019. [(accessed on 26 October 2022)]. Available online: https://www.ipbes.net/global-assessment-report-biodiversity-ecosystem-se....
-
- Persson L., Carney Almroth B.M., Collins C.D., Cornell S., de Wit C.A., Diamond M.L., Fantke P., Hassellöv M., MacLeod M., Ryberg M.W., et al. Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56:1510–1521. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Wang-Erlandsson L., Tobian A., van der Ent R.J., Fetzer I., te Wierik S., Porkka M., Staal A., Jaramillo F., Dahlmann H., Singh C., et al. A Planetary Boundary for Green Water. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022;3:380–392. doi: 10.1038/s43017-022-00287-8. - DOI
-
- FAOSTAT . Pesticides Use. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome. [(accessed on 26 October 2022)]. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RP.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
