Assessing Writing Motivation: a Systematic Review of K-5 Students' Self-Reports
- PMID: 36852261
- PMCID: PMC9947433
- DOI: 10.1007/s10648-023-09732-6
Assessing Writing Motivation: a Systematic Review of K-5 Students' Self-Reports
Abstract
For attaining success in writing, motivation is essential. Crucially, instruction is dependent on knowing the student's capabilities and inner drives. To date, research on writing has yet to establish a consistent framework for assessing writing motivation, and often fails to acknowledge students' self-reports, rather favoring evaluations of students' writing motivation made by others, such as teachers and researchers. This limbo state originates partly from a general skepticism towards the trustworthiness of elementary students' self-reports. Nonetheless, the validity of such self-reports has been acknowledged in adjacent fields, such as reading. Aiming to establish a knowledge base from studies addressing students' voices, the present study adopts the method of a systematic review and investigates how writing motivation has been assessed in empirical studies (1996-2020) through K-5 students' self-reports. Of the 7047 studies identified through database search, 56 met the inclusion criteria and are examined in this review. Results indicate that (a) storytelling is the genre most used to operationalize writing in the investigations, (b) surveys and interview questions measuring students' attitude towards writing are the most common type of self-report used, and (c) students' voices are weighted differently across the studies. Findings suggest that future research should (1) work to counteract existing biases in writing tasks, (2) provide a rationale for their choice/design of measure of motivation, and (3) report clearly whose voices are being heard (e.g., students', teachers', or researchers') and the appropriateness of this choice regarding study purpose, design, and findings.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10648-023-09732-6.
Keywords: Elementary education; Measures; Motivation; Self-report; Systematic review; Writing.
© The Author(s) 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The impact of genre-based instruction on Saudi university students' English writing performance and motivation: a mixed-method study.Front Psychol. 2024 May 24;15:1387009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387009. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38855299 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing and Mapping Reading and Writing Motivation in Third to Eight Graders: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01678. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32849020 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the multidimensional role of self-efficacy for writing on student writing self-regulation and grades in elementary and high school.Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Sep;90(3):580-603. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12315. Epub 2019 Sep 12. Br J Educ Psychol. 2020. PMID: 31513289
-
Students' and teachers' views of written feedback at undergraduate level: a literature review.Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Apr;34(4):552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Aug 6. Nurse Educ Today. 2014. PMID: 23931928 Review.
-
Impact of Sports Education Model in Physical Education on Students' Motivation: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel). 2021 Jul 11;8(7):588. doi: 10.3390/children8070588. Children (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34356567 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Visual analysis of trustworthiness studies: based on the Web of Science database.Front Psychol. 2024 May 24;15:1351425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1351425. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38855302 Free PMC article.
-
How students' writing motivation, teachers' personal and professional attributes, and writing instruction impact student writing achievement: a two-level hierarchical linear modeling study.Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1213929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213929. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37546448 Free PMC article.
References
-
- *Abbott, J. A. (2000). “Blinking out” and “having the touch”: Two fifth-grade boys talk about flow experiences in writing. Written Communication, 17(1), 53–92. 10.1177/0741088300017001003
-
- American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
-
- *Akyol, H., & Aktas, N. (2018). The relationship between fourth-grade primary school students’ story-writing skills and their motivation to write. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(12), 2772–2779. 10.13189/ujer.2018.061211
-
- Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2004). A historical perspective on reading research and practice. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 33–68). DE: International Reading Association. 10.1598/0872075028.2
-
- *Andrzejczak, N., Trainin, G., & Poldberg, M. (2005). From image to text: Using images in the writing process. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 6(12), 1–17.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous