Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 1;105-B(3):301-306.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B3.BJJ-2022-0806.R1.

How long do ankle arthroplasties last?

Affiliations

How long do ankle arthroplasties last?

Toby Jennison et al. Bone Joint J. .

Erratum in

  • Corrigenda.
    Jennison T, Ukoumunne O, Lamb S, Sharpe I, Goldberg AJ. Jennison T, et al. Bone Joint J. 2023 May 1;105-B(5):583. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2023-00032. Bone Joint J. 2023. PMID: 37128861 No abstract available.

Abstract

Despite the increasing numbers of ankle arthroplasties, there are limited studies on their survival and comparisons between different implants. The primary aim of this study was to determine the failure rates of primary ankle arthroplasties commonly used in the UK. A data linkage study combined National Joint Registry (NJR) data and NHS Digital data. The primary outcome of failure was defined as the removal or exchange of any components of the implanted device. Life tables and Kaplan-Meier survival charts were used to illustrate survivorship. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare failure rates between 1 April 2010 and 31 December 2018. Overall, 5,562 primary ankle arthroplasties were recorded in the NJR. Linked data show a one-year survivorship of 98.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 98.4% to 99.0%), five-year survival in 2,725 patients of 90.2% (95% CI 89.2% to 91.1%), and ten-year survival in 199 patients of 86.2% (95% CI 84.6% to 87.6%). The five-year survival for fixed-bearing implants was 94.3% (95% CI 91.3% to 96.3%) compared to 89.4% (95% CI 88.3% to 90.4%) for mobile-bearing implants. A Cox regression model for all implants with over 100 implantations using the implant with the best survivorship (Infinity) as the reference, only the STAR (hazard ratio (HR) 1.60 (95% CI 0.87 to 2.96)) and INBONE (HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.05 to 2.84)) did not demonstrate worse survival at three and five years. Ankle arthroplasties in the UK have a five-year survival rate of 90.2%, which is lower than recorded on the NJR, because we have shown that approximately one-third of ankle arthroplasty failures are not reported to the NJR. There are statistically significant differences in survival between different implants. Fixed-bearing implants appear to demonstrate higher survivorship than mobile-bearing implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I. Sharpe reports consulting fees from Stryker UK, and payment for lecture presentations from Paragon, unrelated to this study. A. J. Goldberg reports a grant from the NIHR (NIHR HTA 12/35/27), consulting fees and speaker payments from Stryker and Paragon, several patents, participation on the DSMC of the PATH-2 Study, membership of the BOFAS Outcom Committee, minor shareholdings in Elstree, Standing CT Company, and SOTA, all unrelated to this study. A. J. Goldberg is also International Editor for Sage FAI, FAO.

References

    1. Goldberg AJ , MacGregor A , Dawson J , et al. The demand incidence of symptomatic ankle osteoarthritis presenting to foot & ankle surgeons in the United Kingdom . Foot (Edinb) . 2012 ; 22 ( 3 ): 163 – 166 . 10.1016/j.foot.2012.02.005 22436838
    1. Glazebrook M , Daniels T , Younger A , et al. Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2008 ; 90-A ( 3 ): 499 – 505 . 10.2106/JBJS.F.01299 18310699
    1. Haddad SL , Coetzee JC , Estok R , Fahrbach K , Banel D , Nalysnyk L . Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2007 ; 89-A ( 9 ): 1899 – 1905 . 10.2106/JBJS.F.01149 17768184
    1. Ben-Shlomo Y , Blom A , Boulton C . The National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report 2020 . National Joint Registry . 2020 . https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2019th%20Ann... ( date last accessed 7 February 2023 ).
    1. Koivu H , Kohonen I , Mattila K , Loyttyniemi E , Tiusanen H . Long-term results of Scandinavian total ankle replacement . Foot Ankle Int . 2017 ; 38 ( 7 ): 723 – 731 . 10.1177/1071100717698695 28535724