Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):e063771.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063771.

Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies: a systematic review

Collaborators, Affiliations

Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies: a systematic review

Emily Boucher et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe and synthesise studies of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence by occupation prior to the widespread vaccine roll-out.

Methods: We identified studies of occupational seroprevalence from a living systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020183634). Electronic databases, grey literature and news media were searched for studies published during January-December 2020. Seroprevalence estimates and a free-text description of the occupation were extracted and classified according to the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) 2010 system using a machine-learning algorithm. Due to heterogeneity, results were synthesised narratively.

Results: We identified 196 studies including 591 940 participants from 38 countries. Most studies (n=162; 83%) were conducted locally versus regionally or nationally. Sample sizes were generally small (median=220 participants per occupation) and 135 studies (69%) were at a high risk of bias. One or more estimates were available for 21/23 major SOC occupation groups, but over half of the estimates identified (n=359/600) were for healthcare-related occupations. 'Personal Care and Service Occupations' (median 22% (IQR 9-28%); n=14) had the highest median seroprevalence.

Conclusions: Many seroprevalence studies covering a broad range of occupations were published in the first year of the pandemic. Results suggest considerable differences in seroprevalence between occupations, although few large, high-quality studies were done. Well-designed studies are required to improve our understanding of the occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 and should be considered as an element of pandemic preparedness for future respiratory pathogens.

Keywords: COVID-19; occupational & industrial medicine; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RA was previously a Technical Consultant for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Strategic Investment Fund, is a minority shareholder of Alethea Medical and was a former Senior Policy Advisor at Health Canada. Each of these relationships is unrelated to the present work. JP reports grants to his institution from MedImmune, Sanofi Pasteur, Merck and AbbVie, and personal fees for lectures from AbbVie and Astra-Zeneca, all outside of the submitted work. MPC reports grants from McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity, grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from GEn1E Lifesciences, personal fees from nplex biosciences, personal fees from Kanvas biosciences, personal fees from AstraZeneca, non-financial support from Cidara therapeutics, non-financial support from Scynexis, non-financial support from Amplyx Pharmaceutics, outside the submitted work. In addition, MPC has a patent for methods detecting tissue damage, graft versus host disease, and infections using cell-free DNA profiling pending, a patent for methods assessing the severity and progression of SARS-CoV-2 infections using cell-free DNA pending, a patent for rapid identification of antimicrobial resistance and other microbial phenotypes using highly multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridisation pending, and a patent highly multiplexed detection of gene expression with hybridisation chain reaction pending, all outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram, Page et al. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Seroprevalence by SOC 2010 major occupation group. *Estimates are a mix of ‘Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations’ and ‘Healthcare Support Occupations’. SOC, Standard Occupational Classification.

References

    1. Magnusson K, Nygård K, Methi F, et al. . Occupational risk of COVID-19 in the first versus second epidemic wave in Norway, 2020. Euro Surveill 2021;26:2001875. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.40.2001875 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mutambudzi M, Niedwiedz C, Macdonald EB, et al. . Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK biobank participants. Occup Environ Med 2020;78:307–14. 10.1136/oemed-2020-106731 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Graham MS, et al. . Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2020;5:e475–83. 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seo E, Mun E, Kim W, et al. . Fighting the COVID-19 pandemic: onsite mass workplace testing for COVID-19 in the Republic of Korea. Ann Occup Environ Med 2020;32:e22. 10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e22 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan TQ, Kullar R, Swartz TH, et al. . Location matters: geographic disparities and impact of coronavirus disease 2019. J Infect Dis 2020;222:1951–4. 10.1093/infdis/jiaa583 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types