Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Aug;57(15):979-989.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105669. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

Non-occupational physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and mortality outcomes: a dose-response meta-analysis of large prospective studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Non-occupational physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and mortality outcomes: a dose-response meta-analysis of large prospective studies

Leandro Garcia et al. Br J Sports Med. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the dose-response associations between non-occupational physical activity and several chronic disease and mortality outcomes in the general adult population.

Design: Systematic review and cohort-level dose-response meta-analysis.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and reference lists of published studies.

Eligibility criteria: Prospective cohort studies with (1) general population samples >10 000 adults, (2) ≥3 physical activity categories, and (3) risk measures and CIs for all-cause mortality or incident total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, total cancer and site-specific cancers (head and neck, myeloid leukaemia, myeloma, gastric cardia, lung, liver, endometrium, colon, breast, bladder, rectum, oesophagus, prostate, kidney).

Results: 196 articles were included, covering 94 cohorts with >30 million participants. The evidence base was largest for all-cause mortality (50 separate results; 163 415 543 person-years, 811 616 events), and incidence of cardiovascular disease (37 results; 28 884 209 person-years, 74 757 events) and cancer (31 results; 35 500 867 person-years, 185 870 events). In general, higher activity levels were associated with lower risk of all outcomes. Differences in risk were greater between 0 and 8.75 marginal metabolic equivalent of task-hours per week (mMET-hours/week) (equivalent to the recommended 150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity), with smaller marginal differences in risk above this level to 17.5 mMET-hours/week, beyond which additional differences were small and uncertain. Associations were stronger for all-cause (relative risk (RR) at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.69, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.73) and cardiovascular disease (RR at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.71, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.77) mortality than for cancer mortality (RR at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89). If all insufficiently active individuals had achieved 8.75 mMET-hours/week, 15.7% (95% CI 13.1 to 18.2) of all premature deaths would have been averted.

Conclusions: Inverse non-linear dose-response associations suggest substantial protection against a range of chronic disease outcomes from small increases in non-occupational physical activity in inactive adults. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018095481.

Keywords: epidemiology; health; meta-analysis; noncommunicable diseases; physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of marginal MET-hours/week for cohorts included in the all-cause mortality analysis. The exposure distribution for cohorts included in the analysis of other outcomes is available at https://shiny.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/meta-analyses-physical-activity /. MET, metabolic equivalent of task.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose–response association between non-occupational physical activity and mortality outcomes. Vertical dashed lines: cubic spline knots (0th, 37.5th and 75th percentiles of person-years); dashed line beyond the upper knot: constrained to be linear. MET, metabolic equivalent of task.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose–response association between non-occupational physical activity and incidence (fatal and non-fatal events combined) of cardiovascular diseases. Vertical dashed lines: cubic spline knots (0th, 37.5th and 75th percentiles of person-years); dashed line beyond the upper knot: constrained to be linear. MET, metabolic equivalent of task.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dose–response association between non-occupational physical activity and incidence (fatal and non-fatal events combined) of cancers. Vertical dashed lines: cubic spline knots (0th, 37.5th and 75th percentiles of person-years); dashed line beyond the upper knot: constrained to be linear. MET, metabolic equivalent of task.

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, et al. . Global, regional, and National cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:524–48. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arem H, Moore SC, Patel A, et al. . Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:959–67. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, et al. . Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001335. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001335 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li T, Wei S, Shi Y, et al. . The dose–response effect of physical activity on cancer mortality: findings from 71 prospective cohort studies. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:339–45. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094927 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wahid A, Manek N, Nichols M, et al. . Quantifying the association between physical activity and cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a systematic review and Meta‐Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e002495. 10.1161/JAHA.115.002495 - DOI - PMC - PubMed