Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):201.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09150-y.

Socio-economic and education related inequities in use of modern contraceptive in seven sub-regions in Uganda

Affiliations

Socio-economic and education related inequities in use of modern contraceptive in seven sub-regions in Uganda

Fredrick E Makumbi et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Advocacy for equity in health service utilization and access, including Family Planning (FP) continues to be a cornerstone in increasing universal health coverage. Inequities in Family planning are highlighted by the differences in reproductive health outcomes or in the distribution of resources among different population groups. In this study we examine inequities in use of modern contraceptives with respect to Socio-economic and Education dimensions in seven sub-regions in Uganda.

Methods: The data were obtained from a baseline cross-sectional study in seven statistical regions where a program entitled "Reducing High Fertility Rates and Improving Sexual Reproductive Health Outcomes in Uganda, (RISE)" is implemented in Uganda. There was a total of 3,607 respondents, half of whom were women of reproductive age (15-49 years) and the other half men (18-54 years). Equity in family planning utilization was assessed by geography, wealth/economic and social-demographics. The use of modern family planning was measured as; using or not using modern FP. Concentration indices were used to measure the degree of Inequality in the use of modern contraceptives. Prevalence Ratios to compare use of modern FP were computed using modified Poisson regression run in STATA V15.

Results: Three-quarters (75.6%) of the participants in rural areas were married compared to only 63% in the urban. Overall use of modern contraceptives was 34.2% [CI:30.9, 37.6], without significant variation by rural/urban settings. Women in the higher socio-economic status (SES) were more advantaged in use of modern contraceptives compared to lower SES women. The overall Erreygers Concentration Index, as a measure of inequity, was 0.172, p<0.001. Overall, inequity in use of modern contraceptives by education was highest in favor of women with higher education (ECI=0.146, p=0.0001), and the concentration of use of modern contraceptives in women with higher education was significant in the rural but not urban areas CONCLUSION: Inequities in the use of modern contraceptives still exist in favor of women with more education or higher socio-economic status, mainly in the rural settings. Focused programmatic interventions in rural settings should be delivered if universal Family Planning uptake is to be improved.

Keywords: Equity; Family planning; Modern contraceptives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Concentration curves for utilization of modern contraceptive in 7 sub-regions in Uganda
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adjusted prevalence ratios (adj. PR) comparing modern contraceptive rate of each Wealth quintiles against the lowest, and all regions against Western

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Health in 2015: from MDGs, Millennium Development Goals to SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. World Health Organization. 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/200009.
    1. Namasivayam A, Lovell S, Namutamba S, Schluter PJ. Improved contraceptive use among women and men in Uganda between 1995–2016: a repeated cross-sectional population study. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219963. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Temmerman M, Khosla R, Laski L, Mathews Z, Say L. Women’s health priorities and interventions. BMJ. 2015;351:h4147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4147. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmed S, Choi Y, Rimon JG, Alzouma S, Gichangi P, Guiella G, Kayembe P, Kibira SP, Makumbi F, OlaOlorun F, Omoluabi E. Trends in contraceptive prevalence rates in sub-Saharan Africa since the 2012 London Summit on Family Planning: results from repeated cross-sectional surveys. Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(7):e904–11. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30200-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. CSDH. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. - PubMed

Substances