Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug;32(8):2755-2768.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07622-7. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery: where are we now?

Khanathip Jitpakdee  1   2 , Yanting Liu  2 , Dong Hwa Heo  3 , Vit Kotheeranurak  4   5 , Siravich Suvithayasiri  2   6 , Jin-Sung Kim  7
Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery: where are we now?

Khanathip Jitpakdee et al. Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that offers comparable efficacy and safety with less collateral damage compared to conventional surgery. To achieve clinical success, it is imperative to stay abreast of technological advancements, modern surgical instruments and technique, and updated evidence.

Purposes: To provide a comprehensive review and updates of ESS including the nomenclature, technical evolution, bibliometric analysis of evidence, recent changes in the spine communities, the prevailing of biportal endoscopy, and the future of endoscopic spine surgery.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on ESS for the mentioned topics from January 1989 to November 2022. Three major electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. Covidence Systematic Review was used to organize the eligible records. Two independent reviewers screened the articles for relevance.

Results: In total, 312 articles were finally included for review. We found various use of nomenclatures in the field of ESS publication. To address this issue, we proposed the use of distinct terms to describe the biportal and uniportal techniques, as well as their specific approaches. In the realm of technical advancement, ESS has rapidly evolved from addressing disc herniation and spinal stenosis to encompassing endoscopic fusion, along with technological innovations such as navigation, robotics, and augmented reality. According to bibliometric analysis, China, South Korea, and the USA have accounted for almost three-quarters of total publications. The studies of the biportal endoscopy are becoming increasingly popular in South Korea where the top ten most-cited articles have been published. The biportal endoscopy technique is relatively simple to adopt, as it relies on a more familiar approach, requires less expensive instruments, has a shorter learning curve, and is also well-suited for interbody fusion. The uniportal approach provided the smallest area of soft tissue dissection. While robotics and augmented reality in ESS are not widely embraced, the use of navigation in ESS is expected to become more streamlined, particularly with the emergence of recent electromagnetic-based navigation technologies.

Conclusions: In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of ESS, as well as an updated summary of current trends in the field, including the biportal and uniportal approaches. Additionally, we summarize the nomenclature used in ESS, present a bibliometric analysis of the field, and discuss future directions for the advancement of the field.

Keywords: Endoscopic spine surgery; Endoscopy; Minimally invasive spine surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kang KB, Shin YS, Seo EM (2022) Endoscopic Spinal Surgery (BESS and UESS) versus microscopic surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J 12:1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221083271 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Lin GX, Yao ZK, Zhang X, Chen CM, Rui G, Hu BS (2022) Evaluation of the outcomes of biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion compared with conventional fusion operations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 160:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim JH, Kim YJ, Ryu KS, Kim JS (2023) Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of full-endoscopic laminotomy and conventional subtotal laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Global Spine J, 21925682231155846. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231155846
    1. Kotheeranurak V, Liawrungrueang W, Quillo-Olvera J, Siepe CJ, Li ZZ, Lokhande PV, Choi G, Ahn Y, Chen CM, Choi KC, Van Isseldyk F, Hagel V, Koichi S, Hofstetter CP, Del Curto D, Zhou Y, Bolai C, Bae JS, Assous M, Lin GX, Jitpakdee K, Liu Y, Kim JS (2023) Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy approach selection—a systematic review and proposed algorithm. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004589
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

LinkOut - more resources