Characteristics of Radial Artery Coronary Bypass Graft Failure and Outcomes Following Subsequent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- PMID: 36858666
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.11.035
Characteristics of Radial Artery Coronary Bypass Graft Failure and Outcomes Following Subsequent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Abstract
Background: When patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), targeting the native vessel is preferred. Studies informing such recommendations are based predominantly on saphenous vein graft (SVG) PCI. There are few data regarding arterial graft intervention, particularly to a radial artery (RA) graft.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to report the characteristics of arterial graft stenoses and evaluate the feasibility of RA PCI.
Methods: This study included 2,780 consecutive patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI between 2005 and 2018 who were prospectively enrolled in the MIG (Melbourne Interventional Group) registry. Data were stratified by PCI target vessel. RA graft PCI was compared with both native vessel (native PCI) and SVG PCI. Internal mammary graft PCI data were reported. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality.
Results: Overall, 1,928 patients (69.4%) underwent native PCI, 716 (25.6%) SVG PCI, 86 (3.1%) RA PCI, and 50 (1.8%) internal mammary graft PCI. Compared with SVG PCI, the RA PCI cohort presented earlier after CABG, less frequently had acute coronary syndrome, and more commonly had ostial or distal anastomosis intervention (P < 0.005 for all). Compared with patients who underwent native PCI, those who underwent RA PCI were more likely to have diabetes and peripheral vascular disease (P < 0.001 for both) and to present with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P = 0.010). The RA PCI group had no perforations or in-hospital myocardial infarctions, though no significant difference was found in periprocedural outcomes compared with either native or SVG PCI. No differences were found between RA PCI and either native or SVG PCI in 30-day outcomes or 3-year mortality.
Conclusions: Presenting and lesion characteristics differed between patients undergoing arterial compared with SVG PCI, implying a varied pathogenesis of graft stenosis. RA PCI appears feasible, safe, and where anatomically suitable, may be a viable alternative to native PCI.
Keywords: arterial graft; coronary artery bypass grafts; graft failure; percutaneous coronary intervention; radial artery; revascularization.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Melbourne Interventional Group acknowledges funding from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medtronic, and Pfizer. These companies do not have access to data and do not have the right to review manuscripts or abstracts before publication. Dr Hamilton is a recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Postgraduate Scholarship. Prof Duffy’s work was supported by an NHMRC grant. Prof Reid is supported by a NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (1136372). Assoc Prof Stub is supported by a National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship (105793). Dr Koshy is supported by a National Heart Foundation postdoctoral scholarship (105969). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
PCI of Arterial and Venous Coronary Bypass Grafts: Insight Into Surgical Failure and Disease Progression.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Feb 27;16(4):468-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.002. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023. PMID: 36858667 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome due to stent thrombosis or saphenous vein graft occlusion and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Dec;16(8):441-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 24. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015. PMID: 26704310
-
From debulking to delivery: sequential use of rotational atherectomy and Guidezilla™ for complex saphenous vein grafts intervention.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0860-y. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018. PMID: 29921223 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary artery versus saphenous vein graft in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized PROCTOR trial.Am Heart J. 2023 Mar;257:20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.014. Epub 2022 Nov 19. Am Heart J. 2023. PMID: 36410442 Clinical Trial.
-
Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: Current Challenges and a Review of the Contemporary Percutaneous Options for Management.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 15;12(22):7118. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227118. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38002729 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiovascular Risk Profile, Presentation and Management Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101078. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101078. Epub 2021 Dec 11. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 34902394 Review.
Cited by
-
Iatrogenic Dissection of the Left Internal Mammary Artery During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Jump Radial Artery Graft Bifurcation Disease: A Case Report.Interv Cardiol. 2023 Nov 23;18:e27. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.14. eCollection 2023. Interv Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 38213744 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous