Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 28;12(1):69-83.
doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-238. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

Surgery for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Surgery for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a narrative review

Jelani K Williams et al. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. .

Abstract

Background and objective: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are derived from the islet cells of the pancreas and have been increasing in incidence. Most of these tumors are nonfunctional although some can secrete hormones and lead to hormone-specific clinical syndromes. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localized tumors, however, surgical resection is controversial in metastatic PanNETs. This narrative review seeks to summarize the current literature surrounding surgery, specifically in the controversial area of metastatic PanNETs, review current treatment paradigms, and understand the benefits of surgery in this group of patients.

Methods: Authors searched PubMed using the terms "surgery pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor", "metastatic neuroendocrine tumor", and "liver debulking neuroendocrine tumor" from January 1990 to June 2022. Only English language publications were considered.

Key content and findings: There is no consensus among the leading specialty organizations regarding surgery for metastatic PanNETs. When considering surgery for metastatic PanNETs, tumor grade and morphology, location of the primary tumor, extra-hepatic or extra-abdominal disease, as well as liver tumor burden and metastatic distribution should be considered. Because the liver is the most common site of metastasis and liver failure is the most common cause of death in patients with hepatic metastases, attention is centered here on debulking and other ablative techniques. Liver transplantation is rarely used for hepatic metastases but could be beneficial in a small subset of patients. Retrospective studies have demonstrated improvement in survival and symptoms after surgery for metastatic disease, but the lack of prospective randomized control trials significantly limits analysis of surgical benefits in patients with metastatic PanNETs.

Conclusions: Surgery is the standard of care for localized PanNETs, while it remains controversial in metastatic disease. Many studies have shown a survival and symptomatic benefit to surgery and liver debulking in select groups of patients. However, most of the studies on which recommendations are based in this population are retrospective in nature and are subject to selection bias. This presents an opportunity for future investigation.

Keywords: DOTATATE; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs); hepatic metastasis; liver debulking; liver tumor burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://hbsn.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/hbsn-22-238/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision tree at the University of Chicago Medical Center for PanNETs. PanNET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; LTB, liver tumor burden; CAPTEM, capecitabine and temozolomide; SSA, somatostatin analog; PRRT, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Comment in

References

    1. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:1335-42. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A, et al. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2011;40:1-18, vii. 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klimstra DS, Beltran H, Lilenbaum R, et al. The spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors: histologic classification, unique features and areas of overlap. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2015;92-103. 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.92 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ehehalt F, Saeger HD, Schmidt CM, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Oncologist 2009;14:456-67. 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0259 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3063-72. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377 - DOI - PubMed