Physical intradialytic patient-reported outcome measures in haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration: A cross-over study
- PMID: 36861385
- DOI: 10.1111/nep.14154
Physical intradialytic patient-reported outcome measures in haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration: A cross-over study
Abstract
Aim: Standard haemodialysis (sHD) is associated with a poor survival and marked adverse intradialytic patient-reported outcome measures (ID-PROMs). Whereas physical ID-PROMs (PID-PROMs) are alleviated by cool dialysate (cHD), survival is prolonged by haemodiafiltration (HDF). So far, PID-PROMs are not prospectively compared between HD and HDF.
Methods: To assess whether PID-PROMs and thermal perception differ between sHD, cHD, low volume HDF (lvHDF) and high volume HDF (hvHDF), 40 patients were cross-over randomized to each modality for 2 weeks. Dialysate temperature (Td ) was 36.5°C, except in cHD (Td 35.5°C). Target convection volumes were 15 L in lvHDF and ≥ 23 L in hvHDF. PID-PROMs were evaluated with a modified Dialysis Symptom Index (mDSI) and thermal perception with the Visual Analogue Scale Thermal Perception (VAS-TP). Tb and room temperature were measured as well.
Results: Except for the item 'feeling cold' during cHD (p = .01), PID-PROMs did not differ between modalities, but varied markedly between patients (11/13 items, p < .05). Tb increased in sHD, lvHDF, and hvHDF (+0.30, 0.35, 0.38°C, respectively, all p < .0005), but remained stable in cHD (+0.04°C, p = .43). Thermal perception remained unaltered in sHD and both HDF modalities, but shifted towards cold in cHD (p = .007).
Conclusion: (1) PID-PROMs did not differ between modalities, but varied markedly between patients. Hence, PID-PROMs are largely patient-dependent. (2) While Tb increased in sHD, lvHDF and hvHDF, thermal perception did not change. Yet, whereas Tb remained unaltered in cHD, cold perception emerged. Hence, as for bothersome cold sensations, cHD should be avoided in perceptive individuals.
Keywords: body temperature; haemodiafiltration; haemodialysis; physical intradialytic patient- reported outcome measures; thermal perception.
© 2023 The Authors. Nephrology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Canaud B, Kooman JP, Selby NM, et al. Dialysis-induced cardiovascular and multiorgan morbidity. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5:1856-1869.
-
- Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Foley RN, et al. US renal data system 2020 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;77:A7-a8.
-
- Flythe JE, Powell JD, Poulton CJ, et al. Patient-reported outcome instruments for physical symptoms among patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:1033-1046.
-
- Desai AA, Nissenson A, Chertow GM, et al. The relationship between laboratory-based outcome measures and mortality in end-stage renal disease: a systematic review. Hemodial Int. 2009;13:347-359.
-
- Peters SA, Bots ML, Canaud B, et al. Haemodiafiltration and mortality in end-stage kidney disease patients: a pooled individual participant data analysis from four randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31:978-984.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
