Commercial Smart Watches and Heart Rate Monitors: A Concurrent Validity Analysis
- PMID: 36862131
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004482
Commercial Smart Watches and Heart Rate Monitors: A Concurrent Validity Analysis
Abstract
Montalvo, S, Martinez, A, Arias, S, Lozano, A, Gonzalez, MP, Dietze-Hermosa, MS, Boyea, BL, and Dorgo, S. Smartwatches and commercial heart rate monitors: a concurrent validity analysis. J Strength Cond Res 37(9): 1802-1808, 2023-The purpose of this study was to explore the concurrent validity of 2 commercial smartwatches (Apple Watch Series 6 and 7) against a clinical criterion device (12-lead electrocardiogram [ECG]) and a field criterion device (Polar H-10) during exercise. Twenty-four male collegiate football players and 20 recreationally active young adults (10 men and 10 women) were recruited and participated in a treadmill-based exercise session. The testing protocol included 3 minutes of standing still (resting), then walking at low intensity, jogging at a moderate intensity, running at a high intensity, and postexercise recovery. The intraclass correlation (ICC 2,k ), and Bland-Altman plot analyses showed a good validity of the Apple Watch Series 6 and Series 7 with increased error (bias) as jogging and running speed increased in the football and recreational athletes. The Apple Watch Series 6 and 7 are highly valid smartwatches at rest and different exercise intensities, with validity decreasing with increased running speed. Strength and conditioning professionals and athletes can confidently use the Apple Watch Series 6 and 7 when tracking heart rate; however, caution must be taken when running at moderate or higher speeds. The Polar H-10 can surrogate a clinical ECG for practical applications.
Copyright © 2023 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
References
-
- ACSM. Health related physical testing and interpretation (chapter 3). In: ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Gary L, ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer, 2020. pp. 32–42.
-
- Anastasopoulou P, Tubic M, Schmidt S, et al. Validation and comparison of two methods to assess human energy expenditure during free-living activities. PLoS One 9: e90606, 2014.
-
- Boudreaux BD, Hebert EP, Hollander DB, et al. Validity of wearable activity monitors during cycling and resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 50: 624–633, 2018.
-
- Dietze-Hermosa M, Montalvo S, Gonzalez MP, Dorgo S. Physical fitness in older adults: Is there a relationship with the modified functional movement screen? J Bodyw Mov Ther 25: 28–34, 2021.
-
- Dooley EE, Golaszewski NM, Bartholomew JB. Estimating accuracy at exercise intensities: A comparative study of self-monitoring heart rate and physical activity wearable devices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5: e34, 2017.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
