Effect of health-care professionals' weight status on patient satisfaction and recalled advice: a prospective cohort study
- PMID: 36864980
- PMCID: PMC9971267
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101855
Effect of health-care professionals' weight status on patient satisfaction and recalled advice: a prospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Research has demonstrated that healthcare professionals are not immune to weight stigma attitudes, with evidence showing that people living with overweight or obesity may experience direct and indirect stigma and discrimination. This can impact the quality of care provided and impact patients' engagement in healthcare. Despite this, there is a paucity of research examining patient attitudes towards healthcare professionals living with overweight or obesity, which can also hold implications for the patient-practitioner relationship. Thus, this study examined whether healthcare professionals' weight status impacts patient satisfaction and recalled advice.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, using an experimental design, 237 participants (113 women, 125 men) aged 32 ± 8.92 with a body mass index of 25.87 ± 6.79 kg m2 were recruited through a participant pooling service (ProlificTM), word of mouth, and social media. The majority of participants were from the UK: 119, followed by participants from the USA: 65, Czechia: 16, Canada: 11, and other countries (N = 26). Participants completed an online experiment consisting of questionnaires assessing satisfaction with healthcare professionals and recalled advice after exposure to one of eight conditions assessing the impact of healthcare professional weight status (lower weight or obesity), gender (woman or man) and profession (psychologist or dietitian). A novel approach to creating the stimuli was used to exposure participants to healthcare professionals of different weight status. All of the participants responded to the experiment hosted on Qualtrics™ in the period from June 8, 2016 to July 5, 2017. Study hypotheses were examined using linear regression with dummy variables and follow up post-hoc analysis to estimate marginal means with adjustment for planned comparisons.
Findings: The only statistically significant result was a difference with a small effect in patient satisfaction, where satisfaction was significantly higher in healthcare professional who was a women living with obesity compared to healthcare professional who was a man living with obesity (estimate = -0.30; SE = 0.08; df = 229; ωₚ2 = 0.05; CI = -0.49 to -0.11; p < 0.001), and healthcare professional who was a women living with lower weight compared to healthcare professional who was a man living with lower weight (estimate = -0.21; SE = 0.08; df = 229; CI = -0.39 to -0.02; ωₚ2 = 0.02; p = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in satisfaction of healthcare professionals and recall of advice in the lower weight compared to obesity conditions.
Interpretation: This study has used novel experimental stimuli to examine weight stigma towards healthcare professionals which is vastly under-researched and holds implications for the patient-practitioner relationship. Our findings showed statistically significant differences and a small effect where satisfaction with healthcare professionals both living with obesity and with a lower weight were higher when the healthcare professional was a woman compared to man. This research should act as a stimulus for further research that aims to examine the impact of healthcare professional gender on patient responses, satisfaction and engagement, and weight stigma from patients towards healthcare professionals.
Funding: Sheffield Hallam University.
Keywords: Healthcare; Patient–practitioner relationship; Weight bias; Weight stigma.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
SWF reports research grants from 10.13039/501100000272National Institute for Health Research, the Office of Health Improvement & Disparities, 10.13039/501100002141Public Health England, Doncaster Council, West Yorkshire Combined Authority, 10.13039/100004331Johnson and Johnson, 10.13039/501100004191Novo Nordisk and the 10.13039/501100000777University of Leeds, personal fees from the 10.13039/100010334Royal College of General Practitioners, Institutional fees from 10.13039/501100002141Public Health England, and support for attendance at meetings from UK Parliament, Novo Nordisk Johnson & Johnson and Safefood. SWF also reports unpaid roles with Obesity UK. MC, SL, and BJL declare no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27819974
-
The Body Advocacy Movement-Health: a pilot randomized trial of a novel intervention targeting weight stigma among health professional students.J Eat Disord. 2024 Oct 7;12(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01114-9. J Eat Disord. 2024. PMID: 39375802 Free PMC article.
-
Weight stigma in maternity care: women's experiences and care providers' attitudes.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 22;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-19. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013. PMID: 23339533 Free PMC article.
-
Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 31;8(8):CD004398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32748975 Free PMC article.
-
Weight bias and stigma in healthcare professionals: a narrative review with a Singapore lens.Singapore Med J. 2023 Mar;64(3):155-162. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2022-229. Singapore Med J. 2023. PMID: 36876621 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Weight Bias in Nursing: A Pilot Study on Feasibility and Negative Attitude Assessment Among Primary Care Nurses.Nurs Rep. 2025 May 12;15(5):168. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050168. Nurs Rep. 2025. PMID: 40423202 Free PMC article.
-
Overweight, Obesity, and Associated Risk Factors among Students at the Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 4;60(6):940. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060940. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38929557 Free PMC article.
-
Collection on reframing obesity in health care and ending weight stigma: presenting evidence for change.EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Apr 27;58:101989. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101989. eCollection 2023 Apr. EClinicalMedicine. 2023. PMID: 37181413 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Plasma fibrinogen level is independent risk factor associated with the incidence of pulmonary infection in patients with spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03332-y. BMC Pulm Med. 2024. PMID: 39425165 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Price J.H., Desmond S.M., Krol R.A., Snyder F.F., O'Connell J.K. Family practice physicians' beliefs, attitudes, and practices regarding obesity. Am J Prev Med. 1987;3(6):339–345. - PubMed
-
- Kristeller J.L., Hoerr R.A. Physician attitudes toward managing obesity: differences among six specialty groups. Prev Med. 1997;26(4):542–549. - PubMed
-
- O'Keeffe M., Flint S.W., Watts K., Rubino F. Knowledge gaps and weight stigma shape attitudes toward obesity. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(5):363–365. - PubMed
-
- Lawrence B.J., Kerr D., Pollard C.M., et al. Weight bias among health care professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity. 2021;29(11):1802–1812. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous